add_minecraft_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must bear full burden. It mentions download, decompile, index but lacks details on side effects (e.g., network usage, storage impact), idempotency, permissions, or execution time. The multi-step process is hinted but not elaborated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single terse sentence covers main actions with no redundancy. Could benefit from structured bullet points or additional context, but no unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, descriptions of return values missing. Lacks explanation of prerequisites (internet access?), error scenarios, or what 'index the sources' means for the agent. Given tool complexity, description is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 67% (version and indexAs have descriptions). Description adds default behavior for indexAs and explains version special values. 'side' is self-explanatory via enum. Description adds some value but does not fully compensate for missing schema description on side.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's actions: download a Minecraft jar, decompile it, and index sources. It distinguishes itself from siblings like add_mod_jar (mods) and decompile_classes (single task).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as add_mod_jar or index_sources. The description implies use for adding official Mojang versions, but no clear when-not or alternative comparison.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.