Skip to main content
Glama
hangboss1761

Spec-Driven MCP Server

by hangboss1761

Related Servers

Alternatives to Spec-Driven MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides structured spec-driven development workflow tools for AI-assisted software development with sequential spec creation (Requirements → Design → Tasks). Features a real-time web dashboard for monitoring project progress and managing development workflows.
      5
      272 npm
      4,293
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables spec-driven development workflows with AI assistants, providing tools for managing specification lifecycles, task dependencies, code navigation, testing, and automated reviews through a unified CLI and MCP interface.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding tools to follow a structured spec-driven development workflow with three phases: requirements, design, and tasks, ensuring approval before advancing.
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a specification-driven workflow layer for AI-assisted coding, enabling agents to follow an explicit 11-phase feature workflow with checkpoints, artifacts, and quality gates.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools are clearly separated: init_spec_project handles project structure and template setup, while create_spec handles the entire specification generation workflow. There is no functional overlap between them, so an agent should never confuse which tool to invoke for a given task.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tool names use a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (init_, create_). The minor inconsistency is that one uses 'spec_project' and the other just 'spec', but the pattern is still predictable and readable.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin at first glance, but the tools are well-scoped for a narrow workflow: setup and generation. The count is borderline because create_spec carries a very large orchestration responsibility that could arguably be split into separate stage-specific tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle of a spec-driven project is covered: initialization and requirements/design/tasks generation, including regeneration and workflow recovery. The main gap is the lack of dedicated tools to list, read, or delete generated spec documents, though create_spec's stage auto-detection partially compensates for this.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues