Skip to main content
Glama
haneefdm

TypeScript MCP Sample Server

by haneefdm

Sample

This is a Typescript sample for an MCP Server

Here's a tool creation example:

this.mcpServer.tool(
'completion',
{
    model: z.string(),
    prompt: z.string(),
    options: z.object({
        temperature: z.number().optional(),
        max_tokens: z.number().optional(),
        stream: z.boolean().optional()
    }).optional()
},
async ({ model, prompt, options }) => {
    console.log(`Processing completion request for model: ${model}`);

    // Validate model
    if (!this.models.includes(model)) {
        throw new Error(`Model ${model} not supported`);
    }

    // Emit event for monitoring/metrics
    this.events.emit('request', { 
        type: 'completion', 
        model, 
        timestamp: new Date() 
    });

    // In a real implementation, this would call an AI model
    // Here we just echo back parts of the request with a mock response
    const response = {
        id: `mcp-resp-${Date.now()}`,
        model,
        text: `This is a response to: ${prompt.substring(0, 30)}...`,
        usage: {
        promptTokens: prompt.split(' ').length,
        completionTokens: 20,
        totalTokens: prompt.split(' ').length + 20
        }
    };

    // Simulate network delay
    await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 500));

    // Emit completion event
    this.events.emit('completion', {
        model,
        timestamp: new Date()
    });

    return {
        content: [
        {
            type: 'text',
            text: JSON.stringify(response)
        }
        ]
    };
}
);

Install

Run the following command:

npm install

Related MCP server: HelloWorld MCP Server

Run

npm start

Available Tools

1 tool
completionD
ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
modelYes
promptYes
optionsNo

TDQS

D1/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 1 tool update
    • First observedcompletion

TDQS

D1.7/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool 'completion' stands alone with no other tools to confuse it with.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tool names to compare it against. The name 'completion' follows a clear, simple pattern with no deviations.

Tool Count2/5

A single tool is too few for a server named 'TypeScript MCP Sample Server', which suggests a broader purpose like code assistance or development tasks. One tool feels thin and insufficient for such a scope, limiting functionality.

Completeness1/5

The tool set is severely incomplete for the inferred domain of TypeScript development. With only a 'completion' tool and no description, it lacks essential operations like code analysis, refactoring, or error checking, leaving significant gaps in coverage.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    D
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A minimal Model Context Protocol server in TypeScript that demonstrates MCP-compliant resources and tools for LLMs, featuring simple resources and a basic tool that echoes messages or returns greetings.
    1
    5
    Apache 2.0
  • F
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A demonstration TypeScript MCP server that showcases basic MCP concepts with simple tools (greeting, calculator), text resources, and prompt templates for learning the Model Context Protocol.
    2
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    A simple demonstration MCP server that provides a basic 'say_hello' tool for greeting users by name, serving as a template for building MCP servers with TypeScript.
    7
    1
    ISC

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/haneefdm/mymcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server