Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mysharedbrain

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides an AI agent with a searchable markdown notes vault, offering tools to create, read, list, search, update, and delete notes stored as plain .md files.
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage a personal markdown-based knowledge base with natural language interactions. Supports creating, searching, updating, and organizing notes across categories like people, recipes, meetings, and procedures.
      11
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to semantically search and retrieve content from a local Markdown vault. Provides tools for fetching specific notes and finding related ones via embeddings and wikilinks.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to capture, search, relate, review, and safely update a local-first Markdown knowledge vault through typed operations such as inventory, retrieve, run_view, update, add_attachment, trash, and restore. Agents get validated access to personal notes and attachments without a generic shell or arbitrary filesystem access.
      28
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a durable, Obsidian-compatible knowledge base for agents using markdown notes and wikilinks. Enables agents to store, retrieve, and interlink knowledge persistently, with tools for writing, searching, and managing a graph of notes.
      18 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct (create/read/update/delete/move/list/append/patch), but read_note vs read_notes and list_notes vs list_directory could cause minor confusion. The descriptions help clarify the differences, so overall the set is well-disambiguated.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (create_note, read_note, update_note, delete_note, restore_note, move_note, list_notes, search_notes). Minor deviations like get_frontmatter vs set_frontmatter and note_history vs recent_changes are still readable and mostly consistent.

    Tool Count4/5

    21 tools is on the higher end but appropriate for a note/knowledge management server covering CRUD, frontmatter, links, search, history, and feedback. Each tool serves a distinct purpose, though a few could potentially be consolidated.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is comprehensive: full note lifecycle (create/read/update/delete/restore/move), batch reads, surgical edits, frontmatter management, search, backlinks/outgoing links, history, recent changes, and a feedback loop. There are no obvious dead ends for the stated purpose of a shared brain/note vault.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues