Skip to main content
Glama
halvrenofviryel

phionyx-pipeline-mcp

by halvrenofviryel
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to phionyx-pipeline-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • vibecheck

      BilalUchiha
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to submit work for external review before declaring a task done, receiving evidence-backed fix lists and verdicts based on git-measured changes and calibrated quality scoring.
      3
      MIT

    • did-it

      preprint-labs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Audits coding agents' claimed actions against the actual Git working tree, blocking completion if any claimed changes are unverified.
      2
      MIT

    • Task Handoff Verifier

      Harmantaj
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to independently check an AI agent's work in a local git repository by recording a baseline, running only the checks relevant to the changed files, and cross-checking what the agent claimed. Returns a compact, evidence-labelled report with a verdict and a ready-to-paste next prompt, so unverified success claims can't slip through.
      8
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools have distinct purposes, though response_gate and verify_claim share some verification concepts. Detailed descriptions help differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools start with 'phionyx_' and use snake_case. Despite some being nouns and others verb-noun, the pattern is consistent.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is an appropriate number for a pipeline validation server, covering key operations without being excessive.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers causal debugging, state snapshots, gates, verification, and reporting. Minor gaps like explicit rollback may exist, but core workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources