planka-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to planka-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Planka kanban boards, including creating, updating, and organizing tasks, lists, and cards via MCP.15 npm59MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Planka, a real-time Kanban board application, for managing projects, boards, lists, cards, and more.1021 npm5MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered project management by connecting Claude to Planka kanban boards via 75+ MCP tools for creating, updating, and managing projects, boards, lists, and cards.1GPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with self-hosted Planka boards through the Planka REST API. It allows users to list, search, create, and update projects, boards, and cards using natural language.3-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to manage PLANKA kanban boards with full CRUD support for cards, tasks, labels, comments, and lists.1528 npm10MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables Claude Code to control a Planka 2.x board via 15 MCP tools, with writes re-read and verified so reported success matches the board, plus an optional workflow that turns the board into durable agent memory.1539 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 56 tools
Most tools are clearly separated by resource and action, but some overlap exists: update_task can set completion while complete_task toggles it, and get_card_details bundles comments/tasks/labels that also have dedicated getters. Descriptions are clear enough to avoid major misselection.
Tool names are predominantly snake_case verb_noun and easy to predict. Minor inconsistency: list-all operations use get_projects/get_boards but get_all_lists/get_all_cards/get_all_tasks, and there is no get_label single counterpart.
56 tools is well above the 50+ extreme threshold for an MCP tool surface. Although the Planka domain has many entity types and each tool maps to a distinct operation, the sheer count will make agent tool selection unwieldy.
Core lifecycle coverage is strong across projects, boards, lists, cards, tasks, labels, comments, memberships, and stopwatch. Gaps include no attachment removal/update, no unassign parent-card operation, and no single-label getter, but these are minor compared to the covered surface.