Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-wagewatch

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables querying concluded U.S. Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division enforcement cases, including employer search, case histories, back-wage totals, and dataset coverage.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      TypeScript MCP server for accessing Department of Labor enforcement data, OSHA inspections, and SAM.gov contract opportunities via natural language queries.
      28
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for NYC housing data, enabling tenant organizers and legal-aid intakes to pull building violations, complaints, ownership, litigation, and evictions. It wraps six city datasets from NYC Open Data.
      6
      11 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      US + EU salary benchmarking, pay transparency compliance, and semantic endpoints. 1,400+ US occupations, 28 EU countries. MCP server for AI agents.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      One-call Australian workplace gender data plumbing via WGEA — cited responses for workforce, pay-gap and inclusion analysis, not a data broker.
      6
      122 PyPI
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: employer_violations searches by employer name, back_wages_summary provides aggregate statistics, violations_by_state lists top cases in a state with optional industry filter, and case_detail gives full details for a specific case. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use consistent snake_case format and follow a clear pattern: noun_descriptor (employer_violations, back_wages_summary, case_detail) and noun_by_noun (violations_by_state). There is no mixing of conventions or confusing naming.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for the domain of WHD enforcement cases. Each tool serves a necessary function (search, aggregate, state-level view, detail) without being too few or too many.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the essential operations for the domain: searching by employer, viewing top cases by state, getting aggregate summaries, and retrieving full case details. There are no obvious gaps or dead ends; the tools work together to provide a complete workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues