mcp-wagewatch
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-wagewatch
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying concluded U.S. Department of Labor Wage & Hour Division enforcement cases, including employer search, case histories, back-wage totals, and dataset coverage.MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceTypeScript MCP server for accessing Department of Labor enforcement data, OSHA inspections, and SAM.gov contract opportunities via natural language queries.28-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for NYC housing data, enabling tenant organizers and legal-aid intakes to pull building violations, complaints, ownership, litigation, and evictions. It wraps six city datasets from NYC Open Data.611 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceUS + EU salary benchmarking, pay transparency compliance, and semantic endpoints. 1,400+ US occupations, 28 EU countries. MCP server for AI agents.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceOne-call Australian workplace gender data plumbing via WGEA — cited responses for workforce, pay-gap and inclusion analysis, not a data broker.6122 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server providing AI assistants with live access to 89 curated US workforce and labor market data sources, including BLS, FRED, Census, O*NET, DOL, SEC EDGAR, and real-time signals from Indeed and ADP.2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: employer_violations searches by employer name, back_wages_summary provides aggregate statistics, violations_by_state lists top cases in a state with optional industry filter, and case_detail gives full details for a specific case. No overlap in functionality.
All tool names use consistent snake_case format and follow a clear pattern: noun_descriptor (employer_violations, back_wages_summary, case_detail) and noun_by_noun (violations_by_state). There is no mixing of conventions or confusing naming.
With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for the domain of WHD enforcement cases. Each tool serves a necessary function (search, aggregate, state-level view, detail) without being too few or too many.
The tool surface covers the essential operations for the domain: searching by employer, viewing top cases by state, getting aggregate summaries, and retrieving full case details. There are no obvious gaps or dead ends; the tools work together to provide a complete workflow.