get_transaction_category_groups

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only states it gets category groups, but no disclosure of behavioral aspects like authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects. Since it's a simple retrieval, the minimal score is justified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with action verb, no redundant words. Perfectly concise for the tool's simplicity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless simple retrieval tool, description is adequate. Could mention return format (list of strings) but not essential. Lacks output schema but that's not required per rules.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. Description adds value beyond schema by providing concrete examples of category groups, clarifying what kind of data is returned.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Get' and resource 'all category groups' with concrete examples (Income, Food & Drink, Housing). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_transaction_categories (categories, not groups) and other retrieval tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_transaction_categories), no context about prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.