Skip to main content
Glama
haiyunsky

HPSILab - Quant Finance MCP Server for Stock Analysis and Options Analytics

analyze_stock

Aggregates AI prediction, implied volatility, options pressure, Monte Carlo simulation, and strategy backtesting into a single bull/bear signal with supporting evidence for any US stock ticker.

Instructions

Run a full institutional-grade quantitative analysis for a single stock.

This is the primary tool for a complete market view. It aggregates results from AI prediction, implied-volatility radar, options-pressure map, Monte Carlo simulation, and strategy backtesting into one unified signal.

Use this tool when:

  • You need a holistic bull/bear verdict with supporting evidence.

  • You want to compare multiple signal sources in a single call.

  • A user asks for a "stock analysis", "market view", or "trading signal".

Prefer the dedicated sub-tools (get_iv_radar, get_monte_carlo, etc.) when you need only a specific data dimension, to reduce latency and token usage.

Parameters

symbol : str Exchange ticker in uppercase, e.g. "NVDA", "AAPL", "SPY", "QQQ". Do NOT pass company names ("Nvidia") — use official tickers only.

Returns

dict with keys: symbol : str — normalized ticker signal : str — "Bullish" | "Bearish" | "Neutral" confidence_score: int — 0–100 directional confidence bullish_factors : list — evidence supporting an upward move bearish_factors : list — evidence supporting a downward move summary : str — one-sentence synthesis

Notes

  • Requires a valid HPSILAB_API_KEY.

  • API access, quota, and ticker coverage are governed by the HPSILab account.

  • Response latency is ~5–15 s due to multi-model aggregation.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
symbolYesExchange ticker in uppercase, e.g. 'NVDA', 'AAPL', 'SPY', 'QQQ'. Do NOT pass company names ('Nvidia') — use official tickers only.
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses aggregation of multiple data sources, API key requirement, quota/ticker coverage, and latency (~5-15 s). No annotations are provided, so the description fully covers behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-organized with sections for purpose, usage, parameters, returns, and notes. Each sentence adds value without unnecessary verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no output schema, the description thoroughly explains return structure. Combined with behavioral and usage details, it provides a complete understanding for a complex tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage for the single parameter. The description adds value by reinforcing the symbol format and explicitly forbidding company names, which goes beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it performs 'full institutional-grade quantitative analysis for a single stock,' using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling sub-tools by positioning itself as the primary holistic analysis tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly lists when to use (holistic verdict, multiple signals, user requests 'stock analysis') and when not to (prefer sub-tools for specific dimensions), providing clear alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/haiyunsky/hpsilab-quant-finance-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server