Get Event By ID

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states that it retrieves details, without disclosing behaviors such as read-only confirmation, error handling (e.g., 404 if not found), or the shape of the returned object. The description adds nothing beyond the basic function.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no filler. It front-loads the core function and is easily scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema or annotations to supplement the description. The description does not specify what 'detail' includes, what the return format is, or any error conditions. While the tool is simple, this leaves gaps for an agent trying to predict the tool's behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description does not mention any parameters. However, the schema provides descriptions for all three parameters (apiKey, eventId, athleteId) with 100% coverage, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Ambil detail satu event kalender berdasarkan event ID' (Get details of one calendar event by event ID), which specifies the verb, resource, and scope. It clearly distinguishes from get_events by emphasizing 'satu event' (one event), though it does not explicitly reference sibling tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The only implied usage is that it requires an event ID, which is evident from the input schema and the phrase 'berdasarkan event ID'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.