No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 25 tools
chat and ask_memory are nearly identical in purpose—both answer using approved conclusions first with raw fallback and return provenance plus a recallId—creating clear ambiguity. Additionally, search_memory, get_context, recall_memory, and ask_memory overlap in retrieval behavior, though their descriptions partially clarify output differences. The raw-evidence tools (remember, create_conclusion, consolidate_memory) are more distinct but still require careful reading.
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern such as create_conclusion, approve_conclusion, delete_memory, and export_memory. A few bare-verb or noun-like names like remember, chat, and session_trace deviate slightly, but the overall convention is recognizable and predictable.
At 25 tools, this sits at the heavy end of the borderline range and feels like more surface than most agents will need. The count is defensible for a full memory lifecycle system covering capture, recall, conclusions, audit, and maintenance, but it risks overwhelming users.
The tool set covers the core memory lifecycle well: capture raw evidence, propose and approve conclusions, search and recall, update/delete/supersede, audit, compact, backup, and export. Minor gaps exist—there is no import tool to complement export, and no direct get-by-id retrieval—but agents can work around these via search and export/backup workflows.
