Skip to main content
Glama
haasonsaas

MCP Utility Tools

by haasonsaas

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Utility Tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A unified MCP layer that serves organization toolkits as MCP endpoints with per-tool permissions, an async approval queue, and full audit logging.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A collection of production-ready MCP tools for common tasks such as web search, code execution, file operations, and database queries, enabling AI agents to perform these actions through a unified interface.
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP orchestration layer that aggregates multiple MCP servers while exposing only 8 meta-tools, dramatically reducing context window usage, and provides SLOP scripting, event monitoring, and tool customization.
      10
      19 PyPI
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides 20 essential tools including HTTP requests, web search, file I/O, shell commands, and persistent memory for any MCP client, with zero configuration required.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-grade MCP server providing 18 tools for comprehensive GitHub interaction, including repository management, issues, pull requests, code search, and CI/CD status, with Redis caching and rate limit handling.
      5 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct utility operation: caching operations (get, put, delete, clear), batch processing, retry logic, and rate limiting. There is no overlap or ambiguity among them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., cache_get, retry_operation). The naming is predictable and uniform across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools covering caching, batching, retry, and rate limiting, the count is well-scoped for a utility toolkit. No tool feels extraneous or missing.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers essential utility operations: complete CRUD for cache, plus batch, retry, and rate limiting. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no locking or logging), but the core domain is well addressed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues