booking-gap MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to booking-gap MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing a Google calendar as a set of non-overlapping events representing one person's time.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables privacy-safe calendar availability queries across Outlook, iCloud, and Google ICS feeds, exposing only busy/free intervals and free-slot search without revealing event details.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAudit any Airbnb, VRBO, or STR listing URL for dollar-denominated revenue gaps. Free tier shows category grades and monthly losses. Pro tier unlocks ranked action plans.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLandlord and rental-property calculators as MCP tools: cash flow, cap rate, DSCR, Airbnb break-even occupancy, rent late fees, lease notice dates, and IRS mileage. Offline and deterministic, with no dependencies.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceLets an AI assistant check your availability by reading private ICS subscription feeds and returning merged busy intervals or open free slots, while keeping event titles, notes, attendees, and feed URLs entirely on the server. Access is read-only and protected by OAuth with a single-account allowlist.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables assistants and agents to query calendar availability from Google, Outlook, iCloud, or ICS feeds and return free time slots for specified days, date ranges, or pasted messages. It exposes read-only tools for finding availability and checking calendar readability without exposing calendar addresses.46 PyPIApache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct role: analyze measures overall gap composition, profile shows temporal distribution, simulate compares configurations, and list_dead enumerates individual unsellable gaps. No two tools overlap in purpose.
All tools share the consistent 'booking_gap_' prefix followed by a distinct verb (analyze, profile, simulate, list_dead). The naming pattern is uniform and predictable.
Four tools are well-scoped for this narrow domain. Each tool adds a distinct capability without redundancy, and the count feels neither sparse nor bloated.
The set covers the full workflow: measure (analyze), locate (profile), explore options (simulate), and drill down (list_dead). The decision to deliberately not include a recommender tool is clearly communicated and filled by simulate.