Skip to main content
Glama
h-kazuki-pixel

booking-gap MCP Server

by h-kazuki-pixel
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to booking-gap MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • OpenSlot MCP

      YHRen
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables privacy-safe calendar availability queries across Outlook, iCloud, and Google ICS feeds, exposing only busy/free intervals and free-slot search without revealing event details.
      3
      MIT

    • HostProfit

      bijou-web
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Audit any Airbnb, VRBO, or STR listing URL for dollar-denominated revenue gaps. Free tier shows category grades and monthly losses. Pro tier unlocks ranked action plans.
      18 npm
      MIT

    • metric-shift-mcp-server

      h-kazuki-pixel
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Answers "sales dropped since last week — where?" by comparing a target period against a weekday-adjusted baseline and localizing which attribute combinations (e.g. channel=web, or Tuesday nights) explain the shift. Runs fully offline on your own CSV — no API key, no ML training, read-only.
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: analyze measures overall gap composition, profile shows temporal distribution, simulate compares configurations, and list_dead enumerates individual unsellable gaps. No two tools overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools share the consistent 'booking_gap_' prefix followed by a distinct verb (analyze, profile, simulate, list_dead). The naming pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools are well-scoped for this narrow domain. Each tool adds a distinct capability without redundancy, and the count feels neither sparse nor bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the full workflow: measure (analyze), locate (profile), explore options (simulate), and drill down (list_dead). The decision to deliberately not include a recommender tool is clearly communicated and filled by simulate.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources