OpenHire — Real Job Postings, Ghost Jobs Scored
Related Servers
Alternatives to OpenHire — Real Job Postings, Ghost Jobs Scored
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI-assisted job search workflows including job discovery, application tracking, resume evaluation, and cover letter generation, with support for multiple job sources and scheduled scraping.8310 npm1AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes job-search and application-management capabilities to compatible AI clients, enabling discovery of vacancies, drafting of tailored application materials, and coordinated human-approved submissions.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI assistants to search LinkedIn for job posts, save them locally, and manage them via a React dashboard.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that automates job applications by discovering postings from ATS boards, applying eligibility gates, scoring candidates, and drafting answers, while requiring human approval before submission. It respects anti-bot controls and only submits with explicit consent.221MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local-first, open-source MCP server that analyzes jobs, matches your CV, tailors documents, and tracks applications — all on your machine with no data uploaded.AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAI-powered job search and resume customization MCP server that automates job searching and tailors resumes for each role.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
The watch pair (watch_intent / check_watches) is clearly split by register-vs-pull semantics, and refresh_index, get_company_info and authorize_application each occupy a distinct role. The only mild overlap is between search_jobs filtered by `company` and get_company_info, both of which answer employer-scoped questions, but the descriptions explicitly delineate postings vs. aggregate trust signals.
All six names are snake_case, verb-first constructions (watch_intent, check_watches, get_company_info, refresh_index, authorize_application, search_jobs). No camelCase drift, no vague single-word verbs, and the noun half consistently names the resource or action target.
Six tools for a search + standing-watch + employer-trust + apply-handoff domain is well-scoped, and each one maps to a distinct stage of the workflow rather than being a near-duplicate. Nothing appears padded, and no obvious capability is crammed into an overloaded mega-tool.
Core lifecycle is covered: search, register a watch, pull new matches, force a single-employer re-crawl, inspect employer trust signals, and record an authorized application. The notable gap is watch management — there is no way to list or delete standing watches, and no direct job-detail fetch, though search results carry full posting fields so agents can work around it.