Skip to main content
Glama
gwq0514

cognitive-harness-mcp

by gwq0514
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to cognitive-harness-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • memento-mcp-server

      jee1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with persistent, human-like memory infrastructure via MCP, enabling them to store, search, summarize, and forget episodic, semantic, procedural, and working memories across sessions.
      1,203 npm
      MIT

    • Recall

      rvreddy24
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to store and semantically retrieve durable memories across sessions via MCP or REST, with tools for remembering, recalling, asking, updating, and forgetting memories.
      12 npm
      MIT

    • memsystem

      neruok
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to store, recall, and manage persistent memory documents through MCP tools, with authenticated context tokens and hybrid lexical/vector search.
      MIT

    • agent-memory

      ac0033
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to manage persistent long-term memory through MCP tools for searching, adding, updating, giving feedback, and forgetting memories, with automated pipelines for redaction, distillation, and reconciliation.
      13
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation: search, list, stats, summary, write, update, and forget are clearly separated by purpose. Search and list both retrieve memories but are differentiated by query-based filtering versus chronological browsing.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the cognitive_ prefix and mostly use verb-style names like cognitive_search, cognitive_write, and cognitive_update. The pattern is slightly weakened by noun-style names cognitive_stats and cognitive_summary, but the convention remains highly predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a memory management server: full CRUD plus search, statistics, and aggregated summary. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface fully covers the memory lifecycle: write, read via search/list/summary, update, and forget with both degrade and delete modes. The addition of stats and summary fills retrieval and introspection needs, leaving no obvious gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources