Rootr MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Rootr MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for a Markdown-backed knowledge repository, offering tools for searching, retrieving, validating, and authoring records, plus MCP Apps that render dashboards and inline tables in compatible clients.-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for a content-first knowledge base, enabling AI agents to search (full-text, semantic, hybrid) and retrieve Markdown documents, list content, and find related docs.9 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to search, fetch, and analyze a self-maintaining markdown knowledge base with provenance, drift detection, and canonical definitions.1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceMCP protocol server for managing multi-project Markdown documents, supporting project isolation and LLM tool integration.298 npm4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Zenvoy Markdown notes app, providing 26 tools for vault operations like reading, creating, searching notes, and managing tasks, templates, and comments.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA simple MCP server for chatbot/human collaborative management of text content stored as markdown files with YAML frontmatter.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 81 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, with clear domain separation (documents, databases, CRM, presentations, etc.). Overlaps exist within domains (e.g., rootr_read_database vs rootr_list_rows) but descriptions clarify when to use each. Overall, an agent can distinguish tools well.
All tools start with 'rootr_' and use snake_case verb_noun pattern. However, verb choice varies (list/read/get, upsert/create/update) and some tools mix actions (e.g., rootr_crm_upsert_company covers create, update, delete). Mostly consistent but with minor deviations.
81 tools is excessive for most use cases. While the server aims to be comprehensive, this many tools can overwhelm agents and increase selection errors. A more focused set (20-30) would be more appropriate for typical workspace management.
The tool set covers CRUD and advanced operations for many node types: documents, databases, spreadsheets, presentations, CRM (companies, contacts, deals, activities, tasks), issue trackers, logs, forms, whiteboards, and more. Minor gaps like user management exist, but overall it's quite complete for the workspace domain.