@atlasyield/mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to @atlasyield/mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides protocol-neutral market intelligence for the AI agent economy, with read-only tools to search agents, retrieve details and histories, compare agents, list categories, view category rankings, and access methodology.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables read-only research on live Hyperliquid vaults through search, ranking, comparison, risk explanation, HLP metrics, and alert tools with timestamped evidence and caveats.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to access Gavel credit data, Bitcoin on-chain indicators, and yield curves, and to generate unsigned blueprints for bids, auction creation, loan repayment, and collateral claims, while ensuring no signing or ranking is performed.-
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceProvides DeFi vault risk analytics for AI agents to search, compare, and perform due diligence on over 700 vaults across major protocols like Morpho and Aave. It enables natural language analysis of risk scores, platform security, and portfolio-level risk assessments.95MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query Verdict's institutional DeFi diligence layer, including letter grades and composite scores for protocols, chains, tokens, oracles, vaults, organizations, and bridges.365 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceProvides risk-weighted yield signals and MOVE/HOLD decisions for ETH staking and USDC/WETH lending, accessed via x402 payment protocol with verifiable signed responses.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Each tool targets a distinct concern: single-vault score, index coverage, exit route survivability, open alerts, score explanation, and multi-vault comparison. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between them.
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_vault_score, get_coverage, list_open_alerts, explain_vault_score, compare_vaults), with 'check_route_survival' as a minor deviation. The names remain predictable and readable.
Six tools is well-scoped for a read-only vault scoring index. Each tool earns its place, covering scores, coverage, explanation, comparison, alerts, and pre-deposit safety checks without redundancy.
The surface covers the core scoring domain well: retrieving, explaining, comparing, coverage, alerts, and route survival. A minor gap is the lack of a way to list all scored vaults or filter by chain/protocol, but counts and coverage partially compensate.