Skip to main content
Glama
gveshk

@atlasyield/mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to @atlasyield/mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides protocol-neutral market intelligence for the AI agent economy, with read-only tools to search agents, retrieve details and histories, compare agents, list categories, view category rankings, and access methodology.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and agents to perform read-only lookups of dated on-record facts about agents, wallets, and endpoints, including evidence levels and history, so they can assess what is known before paying or relying on them.
      4
      1,092 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only research on live Hyperliquid vaults through search, ranking, comparison, risk explanation, HLP metrics, and alert tools with timestamped evidence and caveats.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to access Gavel credit data, Bitcoin on-chain indicators, and yield curves, and to generate unsigned blueprints for bids, auction creation, loan repayment, and collateral claims, while ensuring no signing or ranking is performed.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides DeFi vault risk analytics for AI agents to search, compare, and perform due diligence on over 700 vaults across major protocols like Morpho and Aave. It enables natural language analysis of risk scores, platform security, and portfolio-level risk assessments.
      9
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query Verdict's institutional DeFi diligence layer, including letter grades and composite scores for protocols, chains, tokens, oracles, vaults, organizations, and bridges.
      3
      64 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct entry point (coverage, discovery, route check, comparison, factor explanation, single score, alerts), and the descriptions explicitly say when to use each. However, get_vault_score and explain_vault_score both target a single vault's score and could be confused, with only the '16 factors' vs 'composite + pillars' distinction separating them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All names are snake_case verb-noun pairs (get_coverage, find_vaults, check_route_survival, compare_vaults, explain_vault_score, get_vault_score, list_open_alerts). The verbs are consistent and predictable, and find_vaults is read as a deliberate search verb rather than an inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well-scoped for a vault-scoring index: one per major workflow (discovery, scoring, explanation, comparison, exit safety, alerts, coverage). No tool feels redundant or filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only surface covers the full analytic lifecycle: what's covered, discovery, per-vault score, factor breakdown, cross-vault comparison, exit-route safety, and change alerts. Minor gaps exist (no historical score trend or watchlist/notification subscription), but agents can work around them via alerts and timestamps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues