Skip to main content
Glama
gveshk

@atlasyield/mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to @atlasyield/mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides protocol-neutral market intelligence for the AI agent economy, with read-only tools to search agents, retrieve details and histories, compare agents, list categories, view category rankings, and access methodology.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables read-only research on live Hyperliquid vaults through search, ranking, comparison, risk explanation, HLP metrics, and alert tools with timestamped evidence and caveats.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to access Gavel credit data, Bitcoin on-chain indicators, and yield curves, and to generate unsigned blueprints for bids, auction creation, loan repayment, and collateral claims, while ensuring no signing or ranking is performed.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides DeFi vault risk analytics for AI agents to search, compare, and perform due diligence on over 700 vaults across major protocols like Morpho and Aave. It enables natural language analysis of risk scores, platform security, and portfolio-level risk assessments.
      9
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query Verdict's institutional DeFi diligence layer, including letter grades and composite scores for protocols, chains, tokens, oracles, vaults, organizations, and bridges.
      3
      65 npm
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct concern: single-vault score, index coverage, exit route survivability, open alerts, score explanation, and multi-vault comparison. There is no meaningful overlap or ambiguity between them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (get_vault_score, get_coverage, list_open_alerts, explain_vault_score, compare_vaults), with 'check_route_survival' as a minor deviation. The names remain predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a read-only vault scoring index. Each tool earns its place, covering scores, coverage, explanation, comparison, alerts, and pre-deposit safety checks without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core scoring domain well: retrieving, explaining, comparing, coverage, alerts, and route survival. A minor gap is the lack of a way to list all scored vaults or filter by chain/protocol, but counts and coverage partially compensate.