cypress-runner-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to cypress-runner-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes Cypress as AI-usable tools for running tests, managing spec files, taking accessibility snapshots, and automating a browser via Playwright-core.733 npm12Business Source 1.1
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI models (Claude, ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot) to run and analyze local tests, rerun failures, and orchestrate QA workflows using existing UI and API test frameworks.6 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding agents full control over Cypress test execution, allowing them to run, debug, and iterate on E2E tests directly from MCP-compatible agents.11733 npmBusiness Source 1.1
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to autonomously interact with and test web applications in a real browser, providing DOM/Accessibility tree extraction, runtime telemetry, screenshot capture, and Markdown test reports.32 npm1MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to perform comprehensive web application testing including visual, functional, performance, accessibility, and SEO analysis using browser automation without requiring API keys.7-

Tesults MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnect AI agents to your test results, insights, and targets. Query test runs, failures, flaky tests, and regressions across frameworks including Playwright, Jest, Pytest, Cypress and more.23 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool targets a distinct part of the Cypress workflow: running, stopping, checking status, getting output, listing specs, and managing artifacts. Status and output overlap slightly since status mentions recent output, but their intended separation is clear.
All tools share the cypress_ prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern like cypress_run_spec and cypress_list_specs. cypress_status and cypress_output are noun-oriented rather than verb-oriented, but the overall pattern remains predictable.
Eight tools is well-scoped for a Cypress runner server. Each tool covers a necessary part of the execution lifecycle without redundancy or bloat.
The surface covers running specs, running all tests, stopping, checking status, retrieving output, listing specs, and managing failure artifacts. Minor gaps exist around detailed result reporting or video retrieval, but core workflows are fully supported.