setup_gjq_account_tool

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description fully bears the burden. It discloses persistence to ~/.gjq_client/gjq_client_account.json, security risks of api_key in context/logs, and recommends alternative. This is comprehensive for a configuration tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two paragraphs, first sentence nails purpose, then concise details on persistence and security. Every sentence adds value, no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers the main behavioral aspects (persistence, security) and gives usage context. However, it omits explanation of optional parameters and does not mention the output schema. Nonetheless, for a setup tool with a clear primary parameter, it is mostly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, requiring the description to clarify parameters. It only addresses api_key indirectly, ignoring channel, base_url, and backend_url. The api_key importance is conveyed, but the other three parameters are left unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'configure and cache' and the resource 'GuoJi Quantum cloud account credentials', and mentions persistence to a file. It distinguishes from siblings as no other sibling handles account setup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises preferring the environment variable GJQ_API_KEY, and restricts usage to 'trusted local setup', providing clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.