Swagger/OpenAPI MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| load_apiD | – |
| get_endpoint_detailsD | – |
| list_apisD | – |
| search_endpointsD | – |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_endpoint_details retrieves specific endpoint information, list_apis enumerates available APIs, load_api loads an API specification, and search_endpoints searches across endpoints. There is no overlap or ambiguity in their functions.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_endpoint_details, list_apis, load_api, search_endpoints). The naming is uniform and predictable, using snake_case throughout with clear action-object pairs.
With only 4 tools, the set feels thin for a Swagger/OpenAPI server, which typically involves operations like validating, updating, or testing APIs. While the core functions are covered, the scope could benefit from additional tools for a more comprehensive API management surface.
The tools cover basic operations (list, load, get, search), but there are notable gaps for a full API lifecycle, such as creating, updating, or deleting APIs/endpoints, and validating specifications. Agents can perform read and search tasks but may hit dead ends for modification workflows.