Preparar Exclusão de Transação

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already set readOnlyHint=true, so the description's claim of not deleting aligns. It adds preview behavior context (shows target and scope) but doesn't elaborate on output or additional behavioral traits (e.g., formatting, pagination).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose. Every sentence adds value with no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequate for a simple preview tool with annotations and output schema, but gaps remain: parameter semantics are under-explained, and the output format is not mentioned (though output schema exists). Could be improved with brief explanation of scope meanings and return structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description should compensate. It vaguely suggests that 'id' identifies the target and 'scope' defines the scope, but no specifics on format, meaning of enum values, or constraints. Minimal added value over the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it's a preview helper for deletion, showing target and scope without deleting. It distinguishes itself from the actual delete tool (despezzas_delete_transaction) by specifying it's a preparatory step.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says 'Use antes de despezzas_delete_transaction' (Use before despezzas_delete_transaction), providing clear usage context. However, it doesn't mention when not to use or contrast with other prepare tools like despezzas_prepare_create_transaction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.