Delete Account File

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true, but the description adds value by specifying 'permanently delete' (irreversibility) and 'detach references first' (a prerequisite), plus what exactly is destroyed (catalog record and storage object). This goes beyond the annotations without contradicting them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, tightly packed sentence that efficiently conveys action, target, and prerequisite. No filler words or repetition; it earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core destructive action and the detach-first prerequisite, but it omits how the confirm parameter works, what happens if references aren't detached, and any permission requirements. Given there is no output schema, the description could be more complete about the invocation flow.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description provides no parameter information. The attachment_id parameter is somewhat inferable from the tool name, but the confirm parameter's purpose is entirely unexplained, leaving the agent without critical guidance for safe invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: it permanently deletes the account catalog record and storage object. This distinguishes it from siblings like bundled_remove_attachment (which likely only detaches) and bundled_delete_entry (which deletes entries), making the resource and action unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context: it is for permanent deletion and instructs to detach references first, implying a prerequisite workflow. However, it does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it, so it lacks explicit exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.