A
licenseA
qualityB
maintenanceEnables AI agents to post tasks, manage escrow, approve work, and pay human gig workers on the GetterDone physical-task marketplace.
16
83 npm
MIT
RobotFail MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to RobotFail MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search for and hire humans for real-world tasks.3332 npm7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create projects, post rich status updates with images and video, claim tasks, read replies, and gate work behind user approvals over a live browser dashboard.2 npmMIT
humanforaiofficial
AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to hire real human operators for tasks requiring physical presence, human perception, or judgment, such as verification, testing, data collection, and physical-world tasks.462 npm1MIT
Rework MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage Rework projects, tasks, and workflows through a standardized protocol. It supports task creation, job tracking, user management, and custom field configuration using natural language.22 npm1MIT- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to post real-world tasks, match them to people, and release payments through a delegation-based authorization system that enforces scoped, spend-capped permissions.-
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool targets a distinct action (approve, claim, create, get, health, list tasks, list projects, submit) on different resources (project, task, platform). No two tools overlap in purpose; descriptions clearly differentiate them.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (approve_project, claim_task, create_project, get_project, list_available_tasks, list_projects, submit_task). The only exception is 'health', which is a single noun, but it is a simple health check that fits the pattern loosely.
Tool Count5/5
8 tools is well-scoped for a platform managing physical projects. Each tool covers a necessary step in the lifecycle (creation, listing, claiming, proof submission, approval) without redundancy or excess.
Completeness4/5
The tool set covers the core workflow from project creation to approval, including task management and proof submission. Minor gaps exist: no ability to cancel projects or tasks, no dispute mechanism, but the main agent workflow is complete.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues