Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
standard-vocal-mcp

standard-vocal-mcp

by guillaumehussong
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to standard-vocal-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Smitline

      kaelorlabs
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Make phone calls and join Zoom, Microsoft Teams and Google Meet meetings from any AI agent. A self-hosted, open-source voice agent that calls businesses and people through your own SignalWire or Twilio number, joins meetings as a bot that answers when spoken to, says it is an AI, and returns the outcome, decisions, action items and transcript.
      14
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • AgentRig

      ChenCJ-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables evidence-first regression testing for AI agents by turning production traces into reviewed, replayable cases that gate releases. It supports reproducible, auditable agent evaluation with controlled tool execution, evidence-based judging, and versioned quality gates.
      MIT

    • testing-toolkit-mcp

      byreshb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides coding agents with visibility into test health through tools for flaky test detection, test quality linting, and LLM evaluation harness, enabling them to triage failures, review test quality, and check prompt changes for regressions.
      9
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct responsibility: listing, deploying, evaluating, analyzing audio, diffing prompts, and gating regressions. Even run_eval and regression_gate are clearly separated, with the former generating scores and the latter comparing against a baseline.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The first three tools follow a verb_noun pattern (list_agents, deploy_agent, run_eval), while the last three are noun-centric (audio_forensics, prompt_diff, regression_gate). This split in grammatical structure makes the naming convention inconsistent and harder to predict.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a specialized server focused on voice agent lifecycle and evaluation. Every tool earns its place, and the count is neither too small nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers the core workflow: discover agents, deploy new ones, run tests, analyze call audio, version prompts, and gate updates. Minor gaps include no delete_agent or direct update_agent, but these are not critical for the server's apparent purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources