Orcho MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Orcho MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI coding assistants with real-time security scanning superpowers, including SAST, secrets detection, dependency CVE scanning, and web vulnerability assessment.10 npmApache 2.0- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceSecurely feeds summarized expert security rules into your coding assistance Claude Code, Cursor, etc — zero config, no API key.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceActs as a production-grade safety layer for AI-assisted coding, monitoring Git hygiene, scanning for security issues (PII, secrets, injection), and enabling semantic history search.9MIT

Sekrd Security Scannerofficial
FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables deep security auditing of web applications directly from AI IDEs including Cursor and Claude Code. Scans URLs for vulnerabilities, returns security scores with SHIP/BLOCK verdicts, and provides specific fix prompts for remediation.3-- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAI-powered security scanner for Python projects and GitHub repositories. Detects vulnerabilities, secrets, and provides AI risk assessment.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAutomatically detects security vulnerabilities in AI-generated code, scanning for hardcoded secrets, injection flaws, XSS, weak cryptography, authentication issues, path traversal, and vulnerable dependencies across JavaScript, Python, Java, and Go.16 npm2MIT
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool 'assess_risk' has a single, clearly defined purpose: to evaluate the risk level of coding prompts using the Orcho API. This eliminates any ambiguity in tool selection.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'assess_risk', which is clear and descriptive. Since there is only one tool, there is no inconsistency or mixing of conventions to evaluate, making it perfectly consistent by default.
A single tool is generally too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and can feel thin. For a risk analysis server, one tool might suffice if it covers all necessary operations, but typical MCP servers benefit from multiple tools to handle different aspects of a domain, making this count borderline inadequate.
The tool 'assess_risk' provides a core risk assessment function, but there are notable gaps in coverage. For a risk analysis domain, one might expect additional tools for managing risk profiles, retrieving historical assessments, or configuring risk thresholds. However, the single tool does address the primary need, leaving room for expansion.