Skip to main content
Glama
guardd

Orcho MCP Server

by guardd

Related Servers

Alternatives to Orcho MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI coding assistants with real-time security scanning superpowers, including SAST, secrets detection, dependency CVE scanning, and web vulnerability assessment.
      10 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Securely feeds summarized expert security rules into your coding assistance Claude Code, Cursor, etc — zero config, no API key.
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables deep security auditing of web applications directly from AI IDEs including Cursor and Claude Code. Scans URLs for vulnerabilities, returns security scores with SHIP/BLOCK verdicts, and provides specific fix prompts for remediation.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered security scanner for Python projects and GitHub repositories. Detects vulnerabilities, secrets, and provides AI risk assessment.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Automatically detects security vulnerabilities in AI-generated code, scanning for hardcoded secrets, injection flaws, XSS, weak cryptography, authentication issues, path traversal, and vulnerable dependencies across JavaScript, Python, Java, and Go.
      16 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap between tools. The tool 'assess_risk' has a single, clearly defined purpose: to evaluate the risk level of coding prompts using the Orcho API. This eliminates any ambiguity in tool selection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'assess_risk', which is clear and descriptive. Since there is only one tool, there is no inconsistency or mixing of conventions to evaluate, making it perfectly consistent by default.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is generally too few for most server purposes, as it limits functionality and can feel thin. For a risk analysis server, one tool might suffice if it covers all necessary operations, but typical MCP servers benefit from multiple tools to handle different aspects of a domain, making this count borderline inadequate.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool 'assess_risk' provides a core risk assessment function, but there are notable gaps in coverage. For a risk analysis domain, one might expect additional tools for managing risk profiles, retrieving historical assessments, or configuring risk thresholds. However, the single tool does address the primary need, leaving room for expansion.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues