uploadSop

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only states the upload action but does not mention whether it overwrites existing files, success/failure behavior, required permissions, or any side effects. This is insufficient for a file upload tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences without unnecessary words. The first sentence states the purpose, the second adds a usage condition. However, it is very brief and could include more useful information without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 4 required parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It does not explain return values, error conditions, or file processing details. For an upload tool, this leaves the agent without critical context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and each parameter already has a description. The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as format constraints or dependencies between parameters. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states '上传 SOP 文件到 MES 系统' (upload SOP file to MES system), using a specific verb and resource. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like previewSopFile or querySopList which are read-only or list operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The only guidance is '只有在所有参数齐全后才能调用' (only call when all parameters are complete), which is a trivial condition. No context is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites like needing IDs from likeSelectMaterielList or selectCategoryTreeList (though schema mentions sources).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.