tocaro_create_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the behavioral burden. It discloses the core creation action and the code format constraints, but does not mention side effects, permissions, duplicate behavior, or validation failures. This is adequate but not deeply transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact: main action first, followed by the prerequisite and the assignee format. There is slight redundancy in repeating that the task must be under project, but no filler or irrelevant detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The essential calling context is covered: the required project, the preliminary lookup tool, and the user-code format. An output schema exists, so return value details are not required here. Minor gaps such as error behaviors do not prevent correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description compensates for the two non-obvious parameters by specifying the project code format ('tr' + 9 characters) and assignee user code format ('us' + 8 characters). The remaining parameters are self-explanatory or covered by enums and defaults in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific action and resource: 'ToDoリスト（project）配下に新しいタスクを作成する' (create a new task under a ToDo list/project). This clearly differentiates it from siblings such as tocaro_create_todo_list and tocaro_post_message.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly states that project is required and instructs the agent to call tocaro_list_todo_lists first when the project code is unknown. It does not explicitly say when not to use the tool, but the prerequisite and resource scope give practical guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.