Skip to main content
Glama
inboxvalid-mcp

inboxvalid-mcp

inboxvalid-mcp

An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server built with TypeScript and Node.js that exposes a mock email verification tool (verify_email) over stdio transport.


Getting Started

Prerequisites

  • Node.js 18+ (or 20+)

  • npm 9+

Installation & Build

# Clone or navigate to the directory
cd inboxvalid-mcp

# Install dependencies
npm install

# Build TypeScript to dist/
npm run build

# Run unit tests
npm test

# Run the console demo
npm run demo

Starting the Server

npm start
# or directly: node dist/server.js

Related MCP server: mcp-email-sender

Testing with the MCP Inspector

You can test inboxvalid-mcp interactively in the official MCP Inspector:

npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector node dist/server.js
  1. Open the inspector URL shown in the terminal (usually http://localhost:5173 or similar).

  2. Connect to the stdio transport.

  3. Select verify_email from the Tools tab.

  4. Provide an argument such as:

    {
      "address": "user@gmail.com"
    }
  5. Click Run Tool to inspect the structured response.


Tool Interface: verify_email

Input Schema

{
  "address": "string (email address to verify)"
}

Output Schema

{
  "email": "user@gmail.com",
  "status": "valid",
  "reasons": [],
  "checks": {
    "syntaxValid": true,
    "disposableDomain": false,
    "mxPlausible": true
  },
  "latencyMs": 120
}

Interface Design Choices

  1. Structured JSON vs Plain Text: LLMs and agentic pipelines require predictable, machine-parseable outputs to make reliable branching decisions (e.g. asking the user for a new email vs proceeding with signup). Structured JSON prevents ambiguous text parsing errors.

  2. Three-State Status (valid | invalid | risky) instead of Binary (valid | invalid): Email verification in practice is probabilistic. Syntax failure is binary (invalid), but disposable domains or unverified MX servers don't always mean the inbox cannot receive mail—they signal elevated fraud or deliverability risk. A risky state allows consuming systems to decide custom business logic (e.g. challenge with 2FA, flag for manual review, or display a warning) rather than forcing an artificial pass/fail.

  3. Separated checks in Response: Exposing granular flags (syntaxValid, disposableDomain, mxPlausible) alongside the high-level status and human-readable reasons lets downstream callers inspect exactly which rule triggered without reverse-engineering error messages.


Error Handling & Retry/Backoff Reasoning

  • Fail-Fast Syntax Validation: If email syntax fails regex checks, execution terminates immediately without triggering network operations or retry loops.

  • Exponential Backoff with Jitter: Mock MX lookups are wrapped in a generic retry utility (withRetry) that attempts up to 3 times with exponential backoff (baseDelay * 2^(attempt - 1)) plus randomized jitter. Jitter prevents thundering herd issues under concurrent load.

  • Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed Strategy: When external verification/MX lookup exhausts all retries, the server fails open with caution: instead of throwing an unhandled exception or returning invalid, it returns status: "risky" with reason "verification service unavailable, defaulting to caution".

    • Why: Crashing the MCP tool breaks the agent's execution loop. Rejecting valid users because of a transient network blip causes false positives and bad UX. Flagging as risky keeps the pipeline resilient while alerting callers to proceed carefully.


Assumptions

  • Mock Verification Engine: Simulates network latency (50–200ms) and uses a deterministic list of known reputable mail providers (gmail.com, outlook.com, yahoo.com, icloud.com, proton.me, etc.) to provide reproducible demo results without live SMTP/DNS queries.

  • Static Disposable List: Bundles a local disposableDomains.json file representing ~18 known temporary email services (mailinator.com, 10minutemail.com, yopmail.com, etc.).

  • Transport: Standard stdio transport for local integration with LLM hosts (Claude Desktop, MCP Inspector, etc.).


Production Readiness Roadmap

To transition this server to production:

  1. Real DNS MX Resolution: Replace mock MX logic with Node's native node:dns/promises (dns.resolveMx(domain)), inspecting record priority and fallback A records.

  2. Real-time Disposable & Fraud Feed: Integrate with live disposable domain feeds or APIs (e.g. Kickbox, Debounce, or daily synchronized blocklists).

  3. Caching Layer: Add an in-memory (LRU) or Redis cache keyed by domain to prevent redundant DNS lookups for popular domains (gmail.com, outlook.com), dramatically lowering latency and upstream traffic.

  4. SMTP Handshake / Mailbox Ping: Optional RCPT TO verification with connection pooling and strict timeout handling where deliverability guarantees are critical.

  5. Rate Limiting & Concurrency Control: Apply token bucket or leaky bucket rate limiting per client to guard upstream DNS resolvers and APIs.


Scalability & Architecture

  • Stateless MCP Server: The server maintains no local session state. Multiple worker processes can run behind load balancers or container orchestrators without coordination.

  • Shared Cache & Feed Storage: In a distributed setup, domain MX cache and disposable lists move to Redis or an edge KV store (Cloudflare Workers KV, AWS ElastiCache) for real-time invalidation and synchronized updates.

  • Transport Flexibility: While stdio is ideal for local desktop clients, the server logic is isolated from the transport layer and can be mounted over SSE (Server-Sent Events) or WebSockets for cloud-hosted agent deployments.


Demo

Screenshots of the verify_email tool being invoked via MCP Inspector, showing all three result states:

Valid email Risky email - disposable domain Invalid email syntax

Available Tools

1 tool
verify_emailB

Verify email address syntax, disposable domain status, and MX plausibility

Inputs: address (required).

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Loading tool schema changelog…

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity. The tool's purpose is clearly stated and distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'verify_email' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has only one tool, which feels thin for a general-purpose email verification service. However, for a narrowly scoped utility, the single tool could be acceptable, making it borderline.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers syntax, disposable domain status, and MX plausibility, but lacks SMTP-level verification or mailbox existence checks. This leaves a significant gap for a service named 'inboxvalid'.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Related MCP Connectors

    Related MCP Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to validate email addresses and send emails via SMTP with zero external dependencies.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a verify_email tool for checking email syntax, disposable domains, and MX records, returning a structured validity result.
      1
      ISC
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides email verification, returning valid, invalid, or risky status with detailed checks and metadata. It enables verifying email addresses via a simple tool interface.
      3
      MIT