inboxvalid-mcp
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@inboxvalid-mcp Check if email john.doe@gmail.com is valid"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
inboxvalid-mcp
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server built with TypeScript and Node.js that exposes a mock email verification tool (verify_email) over stdio transport.
Getting Started
Prerequisites
Node.js 18+ (or 20+)
npm 9+
Installation & Build
# Clone or navigate to the directory
cd inboxvalid-mcp
# Install dependencies
npm install
# Build TypeScript to dist/
npm run build
# Run unit tests
npm test
# Run the console demo
npm run demoStarting the Server
npm start
# or directly: node dist/server.jsRelated MCP server: mcp-email-sender
Testing with the MCP Inspector
You can test inboxvalid-mcp interactively in the official MCP Inspector:
npx @modelcontextprotocol/inspector node dist/server.jsOpen the inspector URL shown in the terminal (usually
http://localhost:5173or similar).Connect to the stdio transport.
Select
verify_emailfrom the Tools tab.Provide an argument such as:
{ "address": "user@gmail.com" }Click Run Tool to inspect the structured response.
Tool Interface: verify_email
Input Schema
{
"address": "string (email address to verify)"
}Output Schema
{
"email": "user@gmail.com",
"status": "valid",
"reasons": [],
"checks": {
"syntaxValid": true,
"disposableDomain": false,
"mxPlausible": true
},
"latencyMs": 120
}Interface Design Choices
Structured JSON vs Plain Text: LLMs and agentic pipelines require predictable, machine-parseable outputs to make reliable branching decisions (e.g. asking the user for a new email vs proceeding with signup). Structured JSON prevents ambiguous text parsing errors.
Three-State Status (
valid|invalid|risky) instead of Binary (valid|invalid): Email verification in practice is probabilistic. Syntax failure is binary (invalid), but disposable domains or unverified MX servers don't always mean the inbox cannot receive mail—they signal elevated fraud or deliverability risk. Ariskystate allows consuming systems to decide custom business logic (e.g. challenge with 2FA, flag for manual review, or display a warning) rather than forcing an artificial pass/fail.Separated
checksin Response: Exposing granular flags (syntaxValid,disposableDomain,mxPlausible) alongside the high-levelstatusand human-readablereasonslets downstream callers inspect exactly which rule triggered without reverse-engineering error messages.
Error Handling & Retry/Backoff Reasoning
Fail-Fast Syntax Validation: If email syntax fails regex checks, execution terminates immediately without triggering network operations or retry loops.
Exponential Backoff with Jitter: Mock MX lookups are wrapped in a generic retry utility (
withRetry) that attempts up to 3 times with exponential backoff (baseDelay * 2^(attempt - 1)) plus randomized jitter. Jitter prevents thundering herd issues under concurrent load.Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed Strategy: When external verification/MX lookup exhausts all retries, the server fails open with caution: instead of throwing an unhandled exception or returning
invalid, it returnsstatus: "risky"with reason"verification service unavailable, defaulting to caution".Why: Crashing the MCP tool breaks the agent's execution loop. Rejecting valid users because of a transient network blip causes false positives and bad UX. Flagging as
riskykeeps the pipeline resilient while alerting callers to proceed carefully.
Assumptions
Mock Verification Engine: Simulates network latency (50–200ms) and uses a deterministic list of known reputable mail providers (
gmail.com,outlook.com,yahoo.com,icloud.com,proton.me, etc.) to provide reproducible demo results without live SMTP/DNS queries.Static Disposable List: Bundles a local
disposableDomains.jsonfile representing ~18 known temporary email services (mailinator.com,10minutemail.com,yopmail.com, etc.).Transport: Standard stdio transport for local integration with LLM hosts (Claude Desktop, MCP Inspector, etc.).
Production Readiness Roadmap
To transition this server to production:
Real DNS MX Resolution: Replace mock MX logic with Node's native
node:dns/promises(dns.resolveMx(domain)), inspecting record priority and fallback A records.Real-time Disposable & Fraud Feed: Integrate with live disposable domain feeds or APIs (e.g. Kickbox, Debounce, or daily synchronized blocklists).
Caching Layer: Add an in-memory (LRU) or Redis cache keyed by domain to prevent redundant DNS lookups for popular domains (
gmail.com,outlook.com), dramatically lowering latency and upstream traffic.SMTP Handshake / Mailbox Ping: Optional RCPT TO verification with connection pooling and strict timeout handling where deliverability guarantees are critical.
Rate Limiting & Concurrency Control: Apply token bucket or leaky bucket rate limiting per client to guard upstream DNS resolvers and APIs.
Scalability & Architecture
Stateless MCP Server: The server maintains no local session state. Multiple worker processes can run behind load balancers or container orchestrators without coordination.
Shared Cache & Feed Storage: In a distributed setup, domain MX cache and disposable lists move to Redis or an edge KV store (Cloudflare Workers KV, AWS ElastiCache) for real-time invalidation and synchronized updates.
Transport Flexibility: While stdio is ideal for local desktop clients, the server logic is isolated from the transport layer and can be mounted over SSE (Server-Sent Events) or WebSockets for cloud-hosted agent deployments.
Demo
Screenshots of the verify_email tool being invoked via MCP Inspector, showing all three result states:

Available Tools
1 toolverify_emailB
Verify email address syntax, disposable domain status, and MX plausibility
Inputs: address (required).
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity. The tool's purpose is clearly stated and distinct.
The single tool name 'verify_email' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and predictable.
The server has only one tool, which feels thin for a general-purpose email verification service. However, for a narrowly scoped utility, the single tool could be acceptable, making it borderline.
The tool covers syntax, disposable domain status, and MX plausibility, but lacks SMTP-level verification or mailbox existence checks. This leaves a significant gap for a service named 'inboxvalid'.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
MCP server for MailTempo's public free temporary email inboxes.
MCP compatibility and transport verification server.
MCP compatibility and transport verification server.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEmail validation MCP server using MailboxValidator API to determine validity of an email address.337 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to validate email addresses and send emails via SMTP with zero external dependencies.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes a verify_email tool for checking email syntax, disposable domains, and MX records, returning a structured validity result.1ISC
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides email verification, returning valid, invalid, or risky status with detailed checks and metadata. It enables verifying email addresses via a simple tool interface.3MIT