Skip to main content
Glama
KumarManglam-123

inboxvalid-mcp

by KumarManglam-123
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to inboxvalid-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • tvram-backend-mcp

      amoghar29
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes an email verification tool, returning verdicts of valid, invalid, or risky with reasons.
      -

    • Email Verification MCP Server

      satvikkesarwani
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides email verification, returning valid, invalid, or risky status with detailed checks and metadata. It enables verifying email addresses via a simple tool interface.
      3
      -

    • inboxvalid-mcp

      vigneshachar283
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes a verify_email tool for checking email syntax, disposable domains, and MX records, returning a structured validity result.
      1
      -

    • mcp-email-sender

      AMEOBIUS-space
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to validate email addresses and send emails via SMTP with zero external dependencies.
      MIT

    • Email Verification MCP Server

      05tanish
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides an MCP tool to verify email addresses, returning valid, invalid, risky, or error statuses via the InboxValid API. It includes a mock API and retry logic for robust, type-safe verification.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity. The tool's purpose is clearly stated and distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'verify_email' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has only one tool, which feels thin for a general-purpose email verification service. However, for a narrowly scoped utility, the single tool could be acceptable, making it borderline.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool covers syntax, disposable domain status, and MX plausibility, but lacks SMTP-level verification or mailbox existence checks. This leaves a significant gap for a service named 'inboxvalid'.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources