list_campaigns

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, but the description discloses read-only behavior, pagination, and return fields (id, name, site_url, etc.). It does not mention side effects or permissions, but for a list tool this is sufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise with structured Args format. Every sentence is necessary; no fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Coverage is good: explains all parameters, pagination, and return fields. No output schema but description lists expected fields. Lacks error/rate limit info but adequate for this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, yet description explains each parameter: limit (1-500), offset for pagination, and status with enum values (active, pending, declined, all). Adds high value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'list affiliate campaigns (partner programs) available to this publisher.' Specific verb+resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like list_categories and get_campaign_feeds.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use (list campaigns for a publisher) but does not provide explicit when-not or alternative tools. It implicitly contrasts with other tools but no direct guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.