No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 63 tools
Most tools target distinct resources and actions, and the detailed descriptions help distinguish similar operations. However, the large set contains several overlapping generative/helper tools (integration guide, design advisor, agent eval, snippets, SDK guide) and recurring campaign-vs-program terminology that can make selection ambiguous.
All names use a consistent growsurf_ prefix and snake_case, which aids scanning. But the set mixes verb-first action names (get_campaign, create_campaign_reward) with noun-phrase helpers (integration_guide, program_design_advisor, participant_auth_hash) and uses campaign and program inconsistently for the same core object.
At 63 tools, the surface is far beyond a well-scoped set and creates significant selection overhead for an agent. Many documentation/snippet/advisor tools could be consolidated or omitted, and the rubric treats 50+ tools as an extreme mismatch.
Coverage is broad across programs, participants, rewards, webhooks, integrations, analytics, payouts, auth, and mobile SDK flows. Minor gaps remain, such as no campaign deletion (only status completion), no single-participant delete (bulk only), and no explicit reward-fulfillment tool, but core lifecycle operations are well represented.