Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to us-gov-data-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Read-only MCP server for exploring US federal spending data via the USAspending.gov API, enabling natural language queries on awards, agencies, recipients, and spending trends.
      12
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides natural-language access to SEC EDGAR filings, including company lookups, financial figures, insider transactions, and filing comparisons, over streamable HTTP for any MCP client.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Hosted MCP server that gives AI agents real-time access to SEC EDGAR filings search, 10-K/8-K reading, XBRL financial facts, and insider-trade (Form 4) alerts.
      13 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that wraps SEC EDGAR APIs to provide company financial data, screening metrics, and disclosure signals for investment diligence, with every figure traced to its source filing.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for accessing SEC EDGAR filings. Connects AI assistants to company filings, financial statements, and insider trading data with exact numeric precision.
      21
      495 PyPI
      359
      AGPL 3.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents access to US business entity data, enabling searches across 9 state registries, SEC EDGAR filings, federal contracts, and lobbying disclosures.
      6
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: search_federal_contracts finds awarded contracts, find_expiring_contracts identifies expiring ones, screen_public_companies ranks companies by metrics, and company_financial_history retrieves a single company's historical financials. No overlapping functionality exists between the four tools.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    The naming pattern is inconsistent. The first three tools use a verb-noun structure (search_, find_, screen_), but the fourth uses a noun-noun structure (company_financial_history). Additionally, the verbs 'search', 'find', and 'screen' are near-synonyms, which could confuse users about their exact purposes. The pattern is not uniform across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    With only 4 tools, the server is reasonably scoped for its niche of government contracts and public company financials. It is slightly on the low end but within the acceptable 3–15 range, and each tool serves a distinct query need without unnecessary bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the primary queries for the domain: searching awarded contracts, finding expiring ones, screening companies by financial metrics, and retrieving a company's financial history. There are minor gaps (e.g., no tool for detailed contract metadata or company fundamentals beyond history), but agents can accomplish core tasks without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues