Skip to main content
Glama
greenloom-ai

Greenloom CAD MCP Server

Official
by greenloom-ai

Related Servers

Alternatives to Greenloom CAD MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language control of AutoCAD LT for automation and headless DXF generation, supporting drawing, entity, layer, block, annotation, P&ID, and system operations via an MCP interface.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs like Claude to create and edit AutoCAD drawings via natural language, supporting both headless DXF generation and live AutoCAD LT connection through file-based IPC.
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural-language automation of AutoCAD for drawing, editing, annotating, and exporting, as well as headless DXF generation without AutoCAD, through Model Context Protocol.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables controlling CAD software (AutoCAD, GstarCAD, ZWCAD) through natural language instructions, allowing users to create and modify drawings without manually operating the CAD interface.
      548
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables an AI assistant to conversationally control Autodesk AutoCAD, drawing, inspecting, and editing plans, and includes a cross-platform DXF engine that runs without AutoCAD on macOS and Linux. It exposes tools for rendering views as images, batching geometry, blocks, and structures, measuring and checking plans, and undoing whole batches.
      12
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The eight domain tools (drawing, entity, layer, block, annotation, pid, view, system) are clearly distinct in purpose, minimizing confusion. Minor overlap exists between entity's create_mtext and annotation's create_text for text creation, but descriptions and context generally disambiguate them.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names follow a consistent noun pattern, but operations within tools mix styles: single-word verbs (copy, list, open), snake_case (save_as_dxf, get_variables), and camelCase verb_noun (create_line, set_current). This mixed convention is readable but lacks uniformity across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well-scoped for a CAD server, covering distinct functional domains without redundancy. Each tool contains a comprehensive set of operations, and the count is within the ideal range for agent navigation.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is remarkably complete for CAD workflows: drawing lifecycle, entity creation/modification/query, layer management, block definitions and attributes, annotations, P&ID symbols, viewport control, and system operations. No significant gaps are apparent for typical CAD tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues