granoflow_task_complete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'complete a task' without mentioning side effects, whether it is destructive (e.g., irreversible), required permissions, or any return value. Critical behavioral details are missing.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of a single sentence. While it is not verbose, it sacrifices clarity for brevity. The sentence is front-loaded and contains no fluff, but it fails to provide sufficient information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and the presence of three parameters (one with nested object), the description should explain what happens upon completion (e.g., return status, task state changes) and how the dryRun parameter affects behavior. The description does not address these, making it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional context beyond what is already in the schema. The input parameter description ('JSON object sent to the Granoflow Local HTTP API') is generic and does not clarify its purpose in completing a task.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Complete a Granoflow task' which specifies the verb (complete) and the resource (task). However, it does not clarify what 'complete' means in this context (e.g., marking as done, triggering completion logic) and does not distinguish from sibling tools like task_update or task_export.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no explanation of prerequisites, when it is appropriate to complete a task, or any conditions under which it should be avoided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.