MCP Prompt Optimizer
# MCP Prompt Optimizer
> An MCP server that automatically analyzes and optimizes AI prompts using the OTA (Optimize-Then-Answer) Framework
[](https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT)
[](https://www.typescriptlang.org/)
[](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/)
## šÆ What It Does
This MCP server provides an `optimize_prompt` tool that:
- **š Analyzes prompts** - Calculates clarity score (0-100%) and identifies domain
- **š Detects risks** - Flags security, privacy, policy, safety, and compliance concerns
- **ā Asks smart questions** - Generates 1-3 targeted questions when clarity < 60%
- **⨠Enhances prompts** - Adds domain-specific requirements (tests for code, accessibility for UX, etc.)
- **š Provides structure** - Returns optimized prompts ready for AI processing
## š Quick Start
### Installation
**For Claude Code:**
```bash
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/grandinh/mcp-prompt-optimizer.git
cd mcp-prompt-optimizer
# Install dependencies
npm install
# Build
npm run build
```
**Add to `.mcp.json`:**
```json
{
"mcpServers": {
"prompt-optimizer": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/mcp-prompt-optimizer/dist/index.js"],
"description": "Optimizes prompts using the OTA Framework"
}
}
}
```
**Restart your MCP client** (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.)
### Usage
**Option 1: Use the MCP tool directly**
Once installed, use the `optimize_prompt` tool:
```
Use the optimize_prompt tool to analyze: "build a dashboard"
```
**Option 2: Use the `/ori` slash command (Claude Code)**
The `/ori` (Optimize-Research-Implement) command provides an autonomous workflow with intelligent multi-model selection:
```bash
/ori add JWT authentication to the Express API
```
This will:
0. **Strategy (Opus)** - Design optimal research plan and select best models
1. **Research (Dynamic)** - Automatically search docs, best practices, and codebase
2. **Verify (Sonnet)** - Cross-validate findings and check for risks
3. **Implement (Sonnet/Haiku)** - Apply changes with error handling
4. **Document (Haiku)** - Update README, CHANGELOG, and other docs
**Multi-Model Benefits:**
- 40% cost reduction vs. all-Opus
- 30% faster execution
- Each model used in its optimal zone
See [/ori command documentation](.claude/commands/ori.md) for details.
**Output:**
```
[OPTIMIZED] Domain: code | Clarity: 30% | Risks: none
ā ļø Clarification Needed (Clarity: 30%)
Please answer these questions before I proceed:
1. What programming language or framework are you using?
2. What specific features or components are you building?
3. Do you need tests, validation, or specific security considerations?
```
After answering:
```
Use optimize_prompt tool: "build a React dashboard with user analytics,
chart visualizations using Chart.js, and real-time data updates.
Need responsive design and accessibility compliance."
```
**Output:**
```
[OPTIMIZED] Domain: code | Clarity: 85% | Risks: none
ā Ready to Process (Clarity: 85%)
[Shows enhanced prompt with code-specific requirements including
security, testing, accessibility, and structured output format]
```
## š Features
### Domain Detection
Automatically identifies the domain of your request:
- **code** - Programming, APIs, debugging
- **UX** - UI design, interfaces, accessibility
- **data** - Analytics, statistics, calculations
- **writing** - Content, documentation, articles
- **research** - Studies, investigations, analysis
- **finance** - ROI, budgets, pricing
- **product** - Features, roadmaps, strategy
### Clarity Scoring
Calculates a 0-1 clarity score based on:
| Factor | Weight | Measures |
|--------|--------|----------|
| Goal clarity | 30% | Is objective explicit and measurable? |
| Context completeness | 25% | Are inputs/constraints provided? |
| Format specification | 15% | Is output format defined? |
| Success criteria | 20% | Are acceptance criteria stated? |
| Technical detail | 10% | Stack, versions, specifics included? |
### Risk Detection
Flags potential concerns:
- **security** - auth, passwords, tokens, vulnerabilities
- **privacy** - PII, email, phone, GDPR
- **policy** - fake, bypass, illegal activities
- **safety** - harm, dangerous content
- **compliance** - medical/legal/financial advice
### Smart Questions
When clarity < 60%, generates targeted questions:
**Code domain:**
- What programming language or framework?
- What specific feature/component?
- Testing/security needs?
**UX domain:**
- Who are the target users?
- What platform (web/mobile)?
**Data domain:**
- What's the data structure?
- What specific metrics?
### Domain-Specific Enhancement
Adds requirements based on domain:
**Code:**
```
- Include code summary and complexity notes
- Add security considerations
- Provide test plan and example I/O
- Include error handling
```
**UX:**
```
- Evaluate against usability heuristics
- Include accessibility checklist (WCAG 2.1 AA)
- Consider mobile responsiveness
- Address error and loading states
```
**Data:**
```
- Describe dataset shape and structure
- Show calculation steps explicitly
- Validate data and identify edge cases
- Make results reproducible
```
## š Examples
### Example 1: Vague Request
**Input:**
```
optimize_prompt: "help me with my app"
```
**Output:**
```
[OPTIMIZED] Domain: code | Clarity: 25% | Risks: none
ā ļø Clarification Needed
1. What programming language or framework are you using?
2. What specific feature or component are you building?
```
### Example 2: Clear Request with Security
**Input:**
```
optimize_prompt: "Create a REST API for user authentication in Express.js.
Need endpoints for register, login, logout. Use JWT tokens with refresh
token rotation. Store passwords with bcrypt."
```
**Output:**
```
[OPTIMIZED] Domain: code | Clarity: 90% | Risks: security
ā Ready to Process
**Domain:** code
**Requirements:**
- Include code summary and complexity notes
- **CRITICAL:** Address security concerns (auth, validation, token storage)
- Provide test plan and example I/O
- Include error handling
**Risk Flags:** security
Please address these concerns in your response.
```
### Example 3: UX Request
**Input:**
```
optimize_prompt: "Review my checkout flow for usability issues"
```
**Output:**
```
[OPTIMIZED] Domain: UX | Clarity: 70% | Risks: none
ā Ready to Process
**Requirements:**
- Evaluate against usability heuristics
- Include accessibility checklist (WCAG 2.1 AA)
- Consider mobile responsiveness
- Address error and loading states
```
## š§ Configuration
### Adjust Clarity Threshold
Edit `src/index.ts`:
```typescript
const needsClarification = clarityScore < 0.6; // Change to 0.7 for stricter
```
### Change Question Limit
In `generateQuestions()`:
```typescript
return questions.slice(0, 3); // Change to 2 for fewer questions
```
### Add Custom Domain
Add to `detectDomain()`:
```typescript
if (/(your|custom|keywords)/i.test(prompt)) {
return 'your_domain';
}
```
Then add handling in `generateQuestions()` and `createOptimizedPrompt()`.
## šļø Development
### Build
```bash
npm run build
```
### Watch Mode
```bash
npm run dev
```
### Project Structure
```
mcp-prompt-optimizer/
āāā src/
ā āāā index.ts # Main server code
āāā dist/ # Built output (git-ignored)
āāā package.json
āāā tsconfig.json
āāā README.md
āāā LICENSE
āāā .gitignore
```
## š How It Works
### The OTA (Optimize-Then-Answer) Loop
```
1. Parse & Classify
āāā Detect domain
āāā Calculate clarity score
āāā Identify risk flags
2. Generate Questions (if clarity < 60%)
āāā Max 3 targeted questions
3. Create Optimized Prompt
āāā Add domain-specific requirements
āāā Include risk warnings
āāā Specify output format
4. Return Analysis
āāā Optimization header
āāā Questions (if needed)
āāā Enhanced prompt (if ready)
```
### Keyword-Based Detection
The server uses keyword matching for:
- **Domain classification** - Fast, deterministic
- **Clarity scoring** - Heuristic-based
- **Risk detection** - Pattern matching
**Note:** This is intentionally simple and fast. No ML models, no API calls, works offline.
## š¤ Contributing
Contributions welcome! Areas for improvement:
- [ ] ML-based domain classification
- [ ] Multi-language support
- [ ] Learning from user feedback
- [ ] Integration with custom knowledge bases
- [ ] Automatic prompt rewriting (not just enhancement)
## š License
MIT License - see [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details
## š Related
- [Model Context Protocol](https://modelcontextprotocol.io/)
- [Optimized Prompts Framework Documentation](https://github.com/grandinh/mcp-prompt-optimizer/blob/main/docs/framework.md) *(coming soon)*
## ā Support
If this tool helps you get better AI responses, give it a star!
## š Changelog
### v1.1.0 (2025-11-08)
- Added `/ori` slash command for autonomous research-implement workflow
- **Intelligent multi-model selection** (Opus ā Sonnet ā Haiku)
- Phase 0: Opus creates research strategy
- Phase 1: Dynamic model selection based on complexity
- Phase 2-4: Optimized model per phase (40% cost savings)
- Integrated OODA framework with OTA Loop in optimized_prompts.md
- Added automatic web search and documentation research
- Implemented error handling and rollback mechanisms
- Added automatic documentation updates (README, CHANGELOG)
- Created configurable workflow via `.claude/ori-config.json`
### v1.0.0 (2025-11-08)
- Initial release
- Domain detection (7 domains)
- Clarity scoring (0-1 scale)
- Risk detection (5 categories)
- Smart question generation (max 3)
- Domain-specific prompt enhancement
---
**Made with ā¤ļø for better AI interactions**
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly defined and distinct by default.
A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against for patterns or conventions.
One tool is too few for a server named 'MCP Prompt Optimizer', which suggests a broader scope for prompt optimization tasks. A single tool limits functionality and may not cover related operations like prompt analysis, versioning, or comparison.
The tool surface is severely incomplete for the domain of prompt optimization. It lacks essential operations such as analyzing prompts without optimization, comparing multiple prompts, managing prompt history, or handling different optimization strategies, which are typical in this domain.