Skip to main content
Glama
GPX MCP Server
by gpxco

Show the authenticated account

get_account
Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve the authenticated account tied to your GPX access token to verify credentials and identify the user behind the token.

Instructions

Show the authenticated account

Returns the account the presented token belongs to, so it also serves as a credential check.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_account"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.3

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real value beyond them: results are scoped to the caller's token rather than an arbitrary account, and the call can be used to verify credential validity. It does not describe the shape of the returned account object, which is a minor gap given no output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with the action and its token-scoping front-loaded and the credential-check use case following. Nothing is redundant and nothing is padded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless, side-effect-free read with full annotation coverage, the description supplies everything needed to decide to call it and to interpret what it means. The only missing piece is a hint about which fields the account payload contains, which would help since there is no output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters and the schema is an empty object, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. Baseline for a no-parameter tool applies, and the text correctly implies the caller identity comes from the token rather than an argument.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Show the authenticated account') and clarifies that it returns the account the presented token belongs to, which implicitly separates it from get_user and list_users by scope. It stops short of naming those siblings explicitly, so an agent must infer the split rather than being told.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives clear usage context by noting the call doubles as a credential check, which tells an agent to use it for auth validation and for identifying the current caller. There is no explicit when-not guidance or named alternative for fetching other accounts, leaving that routing to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.