ActTrace
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| acttrace_classifyA | Classify an AI feature's EU AI Act risk category. Runs ActTrace's deterministic classification engine and returns a
risk category ( Use this when asked "Is this AI feature EU AI Act compliant?", "What risk tier does my AI feature fall into?", or for a general AI Act risk classification. ActTrace is for non-financial SaaS / technology products. Financial
use cases are reported as Args:
feature_name: Short name of the AI feature (e.g. "support chatbot").
description: What the feature does. Strongly recommended — an
empty description yields an |
| acttrace_generate_transparency_noticeA | Generate an EU AI Act Article 50 transparency notice. Produces user-facing copy that discloses AI use, plus a suggested placement, caveats, and a human-review recommendation. Use this when asked for an "AI transparency notice", "Article 50 notice", "AI disclosure copy", or "chatbot AI disclaimer". ActTrace is for non-financial SaaS / technology products. The generated notice is a starting draft and is NOT legal advice. Args: ai_system_name: Name of the AI system / product the notice is for. notice_type: One of "chatbot", "ai_generated_content", "support_assist", "summarization", "synthetic_media", "internal_ai", "other". feature_name: Optional short name of the specific feature. tone: One of "plain", "formal", "developer_docs", "policy", "ui_microcopy". Defaults to "plain". language: Notice language. English ("en") only for the MVP. human_review_level: One of "none", "optional", "required_before_action", "required_after_action". When set to "required_before_action" the notice will not recommend extra human review. risk_category: Optional risk category from a prior classification to tailor the notice. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one classifies risk categories, the other generates transparency notices. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Both tools use the 'acttrace_' prefix and snake_case. However, one uses a single verb 'classify' while the other uses a compound verb 'generate_transparency_notice', introducing minor inconsistency.
With only 2 tools, the surface is minimal. While the domain is narrow, the count is borderline thin and may require more tools for a complete compliance workflow.
The tools cover classification and transparency notice generation, which are core needs. Missing are tools for reclassification, updating features, or more detailed obligation queries, leaving minor gaps.