Fieldkit
Related Servers
Alternatives to Fieldkit
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables a primary coding agent to delegate bounded implementation and repair tasks to a local OpenAI-compatible model that edits a copy of the project, runs configured checks, and returns artifacts for review. Exposes stdio tools for capability discovery, task submission, progress polling, artifact reading, and cancellation.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal-first AI agent for approval-gated automation and verifiable LLM workflows.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes 14 tools that let an agent query charter clauses, route and execute an 8-stage collaboration pipeline, arbitrate conflicts with cited clause IDs, enforce safety gates, run receipt self-checks, deposit and recall memory, solve symbolic anchoring constraints, and mine a 330-entry knowledge base plus semantic-field analysis. It also diagnoses image-generation prompts against a formal feature-cluster grammar, all over a zero-dependency stdio JSON-RPC interface.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to open, edit, check, run, emit, and save source programs through structured, revision-checked tools over stdio, confining paths to the launch root and returning diagnostics with fixes for rejected edits.4 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables an AI agent to run local tools on the user's own machine via stdio, including command execution, workspace file read/write, and system status checks.52MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes four stdio tools that let an agent research an application's documented interface, produce a validated single-use plan, and execute read-only operations against public HTTP JSON APIs, static HTML/JSON/text sources, and host-configured CLIs. Runs in-process with no listening port, accounts, or model dependency, returning bounded results while keeping inputs and outputs inside a host-enforced research-plan-execute lifecycle.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: run/discover/describe/undo handle tool execution and inspection, while build_harness_* tools cover the build workflow. The main overlap is between 'next' for pipelines and 'build_harness_next' for the build harness, but the descriptions make their scopes separable.
Naming is mixed: four tools share a clear 'build_harness_' prefix, but the rest are bare verbs or nouns ('run', 'discover', 'describe', 'undo', 'next', 'readiness'). There is no single verb_noun convention across the set, though the names remain readable.
Ten tools is well-scoped for a build-harness and tool-running server. Each tool covers a distinct area of the workflow, with no obvious redundancy or thin surface.
The surface covers core lifecycle actions: inspecting tool readiness, discovering/describing/running tools, undoing changes, and managing build harness status, next steps, submissions, and briefs. A minor gap is that the agent cannot record brief answers by design, leaving that action to a human terminal.