Skip to main content
Glama
goosefly99

profile-project

by goosefly99

Related Servers

Alternatives to profile-project

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Persistent, searchable project memory for Claude Code. Each project has its own local DuckDB with vector embeddings, auto-loading context at session start.
      24
      31
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns a codebase into a queryable graph with semantic search, call graphs, and control/data flow analysis, served to AI coding agents via the Model Context Protocol.
      146
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables private source-code repositories to be indexed and searched via hybrid retrieval (symbol, lexical, semantic, and code-graph), then packages token-budgeted, structure-aware context for LLMs such as Claude.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Persistent project memory + architectural decisions + pre-execution safety hooks for Claude Code. Local-only storage, multi-repo workspace, automatic knowledge extraction via background auditor.
      28
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides Claude Code with local semantic search and indexing of your codebase using AST-aware chunking and hybrid search, enabling deep code understanding without sending data to the cloud.
      MIT

    TDQS

    D1.7/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping or unclear purposes, especially without descriptions. For example, pp_run_status, pp_init_run, pp_list_runs are ambiguous; pp_config_path, pp_config_show, pp_config_get, pp_config_set are confusingly similar. Even with partial descriptions, agents would struggle to select the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools use the 'pp_' prefix and snake_case. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., init_project, list_sources, store_artifact). There are minor deviations like pp_run_status (noun_verb) and pp_next_phases (adjective_noun), but overall the naming is fairly consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    27 tools is on the heavier side but not excessive. The server covers multiple sub-domains (config, runs, phases, sources, artifacts, indexing). Some tools could be consolidated (e.g., merging config tools or status tools), but the count is manageable.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set covers many lifecycle operations for runs, phases, sources, artifacts, and indexing. However, there are notable gaps: no delete operations for sources, artifacts, or runs; no update operations; and lack of tools for user management or permissions. The domain is partially covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues