profile-project
Related Servers
Alternatives to profile-project
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenancePersistent, searchable project memory for Claude Code. Each project has its own local DuckDB with vector embeddings, auto-loading context at session start.2431MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceTurns a codebase into a queryable graph with semantic search, call graphs, and control/data flow analysis, served to AI coding agents via the Model Context Protocol.146MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables private source-code repositories to be indexed and searched via hybrid retrieval (symbol, lexical, semantic, and code-graph), then packages token-budgeted, structure-aware context for LLMs such as Claude.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides project documentation, database schema, business rules, and search capabilities as context for Claude Code, enabling more accurate code generation and query writing.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenancePersistent project memory + architectural decisions + pre-execution safety hooks for Claude Code. Local-only storage, multi-repo workspace, automatic knowledge extraction via background auditor.2814MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides Claude Code with local semantic search and indexing of your codebase using AST-aware chunking and hybrid search, enabling deep code understanding without sending data to the cloud.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
Many tools have overlapping or unclear purposes, especially without descriptions. For example, pp_run_status, pp_init_run, pp_list_runs are ambiguous; pp_config_path, pp_config_show, pp_config_get, pp_config_set are confusingly similar. Even with partial descriptions, agents would struggle to select the correct tool.
All tools use the 'pp_' prefix and snake_case. Most follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., init_project, list_sources, store_artifact). There are minor deviations like pp_run_status (noun_verb) and pp_next_phases (adjective_noun), but overall the naming is fairly consistent.
27 tools is on the heavier side but not excessive. The server covers multiple sub-domains (config, runs, phases, sources, artifacts, indexing). Some tools could be consolidated (e.g., merging config tools or status tools), but the count is manageable.
The tool set covers many lifecycle operations for runs, phases, sources, artifacts, and indexing. However, there are notable gaps: no delete operations for sources, artifacts, or runs; no update operations; and lack of tools for user management or permissions. The domain is partially covered.