get_file_behavior_summary

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description states 'Retrieve' implying a read-only operation, but lacks explicit statements about idempotency, side effects, rate limits, or authentication needs. With no annotations, the description could have provided more behavioral context, but it does not contradict any.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and includes a structured Args/Returns section. However, the Args section is incomplete as it lists only 'hash' and not 'api_key', which slightly reduces efficiency. Overall, it is appropriately sized for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists, the description need not explain return values. However, the lack of usage guidelines and incomplete parameter documentation leaves the tool under-described. The agent lacks crucial context for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description explains the 'hash' parameter (type and required), but completely omits the 'api_key' parameter. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should have covered both parameters; it only covers one, leaving the agent uninformed about the optional api_key.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Retrieve' and identifies a clear resource: 'summary of all the file behavior reports from all the sandboxes'. This clearly distinguishes it from the sibling tool 'get_file_behavior_report', which likely retrieves a single report.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_file_behavior_report, get_file_report). There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.