Proton Mail Bridge MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Proton Mail Bridge MCP
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables comprehensive ProtonMail management through SMTP and IMAP, supporting email sending/reading, folder operations, analytics, and contact tracking with advanced search and automation capabilities.43-
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to send, read, search, and organize emails via ProtonMail using Proton Bridge. Supports MCP-compatible clients like Claude and Cursor.1847 npm4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with a Proton Mail mailbox through Proton Bridge, supporting listing, searching, reading, sending, and organizing emails.-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, search, send, reply, and organize ProtonMail emails through a local ProtonMail Bridge, with automatic Bridge discovery and pinned TLS verification.23LGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI clients to interact with ProtonMail accounts through the Proton Bridge using SMTP and IMAP protocols. Provides email management capabilities via secure local bridge connections.21 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to read, organize, and send Proton Mail through the local Proton Bridge, with careful gating for sending and attachment access.341Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to send, read, search, and organize email from Proton Mail accounts via SMTP and IMAP.64 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 96 tools
With 96 tools, many share similar purposes (e.g., multiple search, thread, delete, and send variants). The detailed descriptions cross-reference alternatives and help, but the sheer number of overlapping options creates a high risk of misselection.
All names use consistent snake_case and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_emails, create_draft, send_email). A few noun-first outliers like folder_stats and top_senders slightly break the pattern.
96 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range for a well-scoped server. While the domain is complex, the count is excessive and many tools could be consolidated (e.g., single/bulk/thread variants).
The surface covers an exhaustive range of email lifecycle operations: sending, drafts, templates, labels, folders, search, sync, attachments, analytics, and diagnostics. Few gaps exist beyond niche features like contact management.