Skip to main content
Glama
googlarz

Proton Mail Bridge MCP

by googlarz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Proton Mail Bridge MCP

  • ProtonMail Pro MCP

    anyrxo
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Enables comprehensive ProtonMail management through SMTP and IMAP, supporting email sending/reading, folder operations, analytics, and contact tracking with advanced search and automation capabilities.
    43
    -

Related Servers

  • ProtonMail MCP Server

    ronamosa
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to send, read, search, and organize emails via ProtonMail using Proton Bridge. Supports MCP-compatible clients like Claude and Cursor.
    17
    16 npm
    4
    MIT

  • proton-mail-mcp

    graememeyer
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to interact with a Proton Mail mailbox through Proton Bridge, supporting listing, searching, reading, sending, and organizing emails.
    -

  • protonmail-mcp

    dadamonis
    A
    license
    B
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to read, search, send, reply, and organize ProtonMail emails through a local ProtonMail Bridge, with automatic Bridge discovery and pinned TLS verification.
    23
    LGPL 3.0

  • protonmail-mcp

    darkroomdevs
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI clients to interact with ProtonMail accounts through the Proton Bridge using SMTP and IMAP protocols. Provides email management capabilities via secure local bridge connections.
    8 npm
    MIT

  • proton-bridge-mcp

    Considus
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to read, organize, and send Proton Mail through the local Proton Bridge, with careful gating for sending and attachment access.
    34
    1
    Apache 2.0

  • Proton Mail MCP Server

    fincher65
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI assistants to send, read, search, and organize email from Proton Mail accounts via SMTP and IMAP.
    73 npm
    MIT
Deploy Server
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Scored across 96 tools

Disambiguation2/5

Despite extensive cross-referencing in descriptions, several tool clusters have genuinely fuzzy boundaries: analytics tools (get_email_stats, get_email_analytics, get_volume_trends, top_senders) overlap heavily, and bulk_delete/batch_email_action/bulk_move/bulk_update_flags/bulk_update_labels split the same conceptual operation by action type. With 96 tools, an agent faces real misselection risk when choosing between list_drafts vs list_remote_drafts or search_emails vs search_indexed_emails without reading very long descriptions carefully.

Naming Consistency4/5

The dominant pattern is consistent lowercase verb_noun (list_snoozed, create_draft, delete_folder, send_email, get_threads), which is easy to predict. Minor deviations prevent a 5: 'bulk_*' vs 'batch_*' prefixes are used interchangeably for similar operations, and a few phrasal verbs (run_doctor, wait_for_mailbox_changes, clear_index) break the otherwise uniform rhythm.

Tool Count1/5

At 96 tools this is an extreme count, exceeding the stated 50+ threshold for a 1 even though mail management is a broad domain. The surface could be significantly consolidated: analytics could collapse into one parameterized tool, bulk/batch operations could share a single action dispatcher, and attachment save/get variants could be unified.

Completeness5/5

The domain coverage is exceptionally thorough: send/draft/review flows, scheduling and snooze with cancel paths, full folder/label CRUD, thread lifecycle actions, attachments with multiple retrieval strategies, templates with rendering, indexing and sync, analytics, import/export, and diagnostics. Nearly every mutation has a reversible counterpart or a clear 'prefer X' alternative, leaving no obvious dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessSlow

Resources