Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-BOS

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server built with the mcp-framework for developing and managing custom tools. It provides a structured foundation for building and integrating modular components like data processors and API clients into Claude Desktop.
      2 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for Claude Desktop that provides structured memory management across chat sessions, allowing Claude to maintain context and build a knowledge base within project directories.
      6 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A Python framework for building MCP servers that makes it simple to expose application data and actions to AI clients like Claude Desktop, Cursor, and VS Code through the Model Context Protocol. It wraps protocol handling behind a clean, decorator-based API allowing focus on business logic.
      23 PyPI
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A production-ready Model Context Protocol server that provides comprehensive file system management capabilities for seamless integration with Claude Desktop.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that extends AI capabilities by providing file system access and management functionalities to Claude or other AI assistants.
      212 npm
      5
      -

    TDQS

    D1.7/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    The tools are highly ambiguous and overlapping in purpose. 'add' performs arithmetic, 'hello' returns a greeting, 'my_tool' is described only as 'custom tool' with no clear purpose, and 'server_info' retrieves server metadata. 'my_tool' is completely undefined, making it impossible to distinguish from others, and the set lacks clear domain boundaries, leading to high misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming is inconsistent with mixed conventions. 'add' and 'hello' use simple verb forms, 'my_tool' uses a vague noun phrase, and 'server_info' uses a noun_verb pattern. There is no predictable naming scheme across the set, though all names are readable in English.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 4 tools, the count feels too thin for any coherent domain. The tools span arithmetic, greetings, an undefined custom function, and server metadata, suggesting a poorly scoped utility set rather than a focused server purpose. This minimal count does not adequately cover a meaningful operational surface.

    Completeness1/5

    The tool set is severely incomplete for any inferable domain. If interpreted as a general utility server, it lacks basic operations like subtraction, multiplication, or data processing. The inclusion of 'my_tool' without description creates a dead end, and there are significant gaps that will cause agent failures due to missing core functionalities.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues