A
licenseNot graded
qualityA
maintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to generate images and videos, synthesize speech, clone and design voices, and dynamically configure API interactions.
549 npm
MIT
MCP Server SimpleNGAT
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP Server SimpleNGAT
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to generate images and videos, synthesize speech, clone and design voices, and create related media outputs.549 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceExposes video generation and editing tools to MCP-capable clients, enabling text-to-video, image-to-video, video editing, reusable voice and character profiles, and task status queries through natural language.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to generate images and videos, synthesize speech, clone voices, and design custom voices through integrated AI APIs, with configurable output modes and local or cloud transports.549 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to generate images and videos, synthesize speech, clone voices, and design custom voices through the provider's APIs.549 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible clients to generate images and videos, synthesize speech, and clone or design voices through integrated AI APIs.549 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Scored across 8 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: image generation, user info, voice listing, video status polling, video submission, image upscaling, deletion of upscaled files, and health checks. No overlaps or ambiguity exist, so an agent can select the correct tool without confusion.
Naming Consistency4/5
Tools follow a consistent 'simplengat_verb_noun' pattern (e.g., generate_image, list_voices, generate_video, upscale_image). Minor deviations include 'user_me' (odd phrasing) and 'video_status' (noun-noun rather than verb-noun), but the overall pattern is predictable and readable.
Tool Count5/5
With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for a media generation service. Each tool covers a distinct operation (generate, upscale, delete, status, user, health, voices), and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range, giving agents sufficient functionality without bloat.
Completeness4/5
The tool surface covers the full image generation lifecycle (generate, upscale, delete upscaled) and video lifecycle (generate, status, list voices), plus user info and health checks. Minor gaps like video cancellation or image deletion for non-upscaled files are not critical, but the core workflows are well-covered.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues