Expense Summary
get_expensesList user expenses and cashflow summary. API key required.
Instructions
List user expenses / cashflow summary. Requires API key. ($0.10; API key required)
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
get_expensesList user expenses and cashflow summary. API key required.
List user expenses / cashflow summary. Requires API key. ($0.10; API key required)
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive. Description adds cost ($0.10) and API key requirement, which are useful behavioral traits beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Short two-sentence description. Slight redundancy ('Requires API key' appears twice), but overall concise and front-loaded with purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, yet description fails to specify return type or structure (list vs summary). Vague on what the tool actually returns, leaving agent uninformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so baseline 4 applies. Description does not need to add parameter info.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states it lists user expenses/cashflow summary, which is specific. However, it could more explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like get_life_context, but the purpose is distinct.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Mentions API key requirement and cost, but no context on appropriate usage scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/gohluke/dayze-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server