FastMCP Demo
Related Servers
Alternatives to FastMCP Demo
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA minimal test MCP server built with TypeScript, demonstrating basic Model Context Protocol capabilities like tools, resources, and prompts.9 npmISC
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK. Includes example tools like calculator and greeting functions, plus system information resources.3-
- AlicenseDqualityDmaintenanceA minimal Model Context Protocol server in TypeScript that demonstrates MCP-compliant resources and tools for LLMs, featuring simple resources and a basic tool that echoes messages or returns greetings.15Apache 2.0
- -licenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK. Includes example tools for calculations and greetings, plus system information resources.3-
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides greeting tools, resources, and prompts, demonstrating client-server interaction using TypeScript.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA boilerplate project for quickly developing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers using TypeScript SDK, with example implementations of calculator and greeting tools, plus resource management capabilities.-
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have completely distinct purposes: 'calculate' handles arithmetic operations, while 'hello' provides a greeting. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool.
Both tool names follow a consistent pattern of using simple, descriptive verbs ('calculate', 'hello') without any mixing of conventions like camelCase or snake_case. The naming is straightforward and predictable.
With only two tools, the server feels thin and under-scoped for a general-purpose demo. While the tools are distinct, the count is too low to meaningfully cover a domain or provide a coherent set of operations, limiting utility.
The server lacks a clear domain, making it impossible to assess coverage meaningfully. The tools are trivial and unrelated (arithmetic and greeting), offering no cohesive workflow or lifecycle, which severely limits agent functionality.