MCP HTTP Requests
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP HTTP Requests
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides HTTP client capabilities with browser impersonation for Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge across multiple operating systems. It enables tools for making authenticated web requests, handling multipart file uploads, and retrieving responses in various formats.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceHTTP Inspector MCP Server enables sending arbitrary HTTP requests, viewing history via a web panel, and taking screenshots of the panel for AI penetration testing workflows.1GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for API request automation and testing, with multi-project workspaces, environment profiles, OAuth2 support, WebSocket testing, assertions, and history auditing.6 npm5MIT
- FlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAI-native HTTP security testing MCP server — 18 tools with raw HTTP/1.1 + HTTP/2 control18-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides HTTP client capabilities with support for full HTTP methods, custom headers, query parameters, request bodies, and configurable timeouts.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to intercept, inspect, and modify HTTP traffic, with tools for searching, filtering, and managing captured requests and interceptors.25 npm8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 8 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: seven tools correspond to specific HTTP methods (GET, POST, etc.), while the eighth tool (http_raw_request) is explicitly for security testing with absolute precision. There is no ambiguity or overlap between the standard HTTP method tools, and the security tool is clearly differentiated by its specialized function.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with the prefix 'http_' followed by the HTTP method name (e.g., http_get, http_post) or a descriptive term (http_raw_request). This uniformity makes the tools easily predictable and readable, with no deviations in naming conventions.
With 8 tools, the set is well-scoped for an HTTP requests server. It covers all standard HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS) plus a specialized security testing tool, which is a reasonable and complete set for the domain without being excessive or insufficient.
The tool surface is complete for the domain of HTTP requests. It provides full CRUD-like coverage with all standard HTTP methods, and the inclusion of http_raw_request adds specialized functionality for security testing, ensuring no gaps in core operations or advanced use cases.