Skip to main content
Glama
godzeo
by godzeo

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP HTTP Requests

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides HTTP client capabilities with browser impersonation for Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge across multiple operating systems. It enables tools for making authenticated web requests, handling multipart file uploads, and retrieving responses in various formats.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      HTTP Inspector MCP Server enables sending arbitrary HTTP requests, viewing history via a web panel, and taking screenshots of the panel for AI penetration testing workflows.
      1
      GPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for API request automation and testing, with multi-project workspaces, environment profiles, OAuth2 support, WebSocket testing, assertions, and history auditing.
      6 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides HTTP client capabilities with support for full HTTP methods, custom headers, query parameters, request bodies, and configurable timeouts.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to intercept, inspect, and modify HTTP traffic, with tools for searching, filtering, and managing captured requests and interceptors.
      25 npm
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: seven tools correspond to specific HTTP methods (GET, POST, etc.), while the eighth tool (http_raw_request) is explicitly for security testing with absolute precision. There is no ambiguity or overlap between the standard HTTP method tools, and the security tool is clearly differentiated by its specialized function.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case pattern with the prefix 'http_' followed by the HTTP method name (e.g., http_get, http_post) or a descriptive term (http_raw_request). This uniformity makes the tools easily predictable and readable, with no deviations in naming conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the set is well-scoped for an HTTP requests server. It covers all standard HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH, HEAD, OPTIONS) plus a specialized security testing tool, which is a reasonable and complete set for the domain without being excessive or insufficient.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface is complete for the domain of HTTP requests. It provides full CRUD-like coverage with all standard HTTP methods, and the inclusion of http_raw_request adds specialized functionality for security testing, ensuring no gaps in core operations or advanced use cases.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues