Get monthly budget

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint, covering safety and idempotency. The description adds that the tool returns schedule splits and linked usage, which is behavioral context beyond annotations. However, it does not disclose potential errors, missing fields, or other traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded with the verb 'Get' and key resources. It is concise with no wasted words, though the phrase 'or one budget entry' could be slightly clearer. Overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (11 parameters, no output schema, no param descriptions), the description is severely lacking. It does not explain how to use the tool, what the output contains beyond mentioned items, or how to interpret results. The tool has high information needs that are unmet.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 11 parameters and 0% schema description coverage, the description should explain parameter meanings. It does not mention any parameter, leaving all parameters opaque. The description only states the general output, not how to specify the month, entry ID, pagination, or filtering. This is insufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a monthly budget period summary or a single budget entry with schedule splits and linked requisition/payment voucher usage. It distinguishes from sibling 'limu_list_monthly_budgets' which lists budgets, implying this tool gets detailed information for a specific entry or period.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. The description implies it is for getting a specific budget entry or periodic summary, but does not compare with alternatives like 'limu_list_monthly_budgets' or other detail tools. The context is present but not explicitly guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.