Skip to main content
Glama
gnshb

salome-mcp

by gnshb
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to salome-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • kompas-3d-ai-bridge

      quja
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that connects AI agents to KOMPAS-3D CAD, enabling automated 3D document operations through deterministic COM/API7 calls.
      1
      -

    • MCP CAD Studio

      flujo-app
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A parametric CAD workspace as an MCP server, enabling agents to create, edit, and manipulate 3D models through tools, with a live studio UI and STL/OBJ import/export.
      12
      32 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Forge

      yuvitbatra
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A local MCP server that enables AI agents to create and edit parametric CAD models through natural language, using a validated operation graph that compiles to real geometry.
      1
      MIT

    • pyNastran MCP Server

      Shaoqigit
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to interact with Nastran FEA models by reading, writing, and analyzing BDF and OP2 files. It provides tools for mesh quality assessment, geometric analysis, and automated report generation for structural engineering workflows.
      3
      MIT

    • COMSOL MCP Server

      HBPEKING-TKS
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to automate COMSOL Multiphysics simulations, including model management, geometry building, physics configuration, meshing, solving, and results visualization through the MCP protocol.
      78
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.5/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have overlapping purposes: boolean_operation duplicates fuse_objects/cut_objects/common_objects, create_group/create_groups/create_surface_group/create_volume_group are redundant, and copy_object vs duplicate_object are similar. This overlapping surface will confuse an agent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_, create_, list_, export_, import_, etc.). Minor deviations include 'boolean_operation' (not a verb) and the somewhat inconsistent group creation variants (create_group, create_groups, create_surface_group, create_volume_group), but overall the naming is predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 36 tools, the server is over-scoped for the domain. While SALOME is complex, the tool set includes many near-duplicates and convenience wrappers that inflate the count beyond what is necessary, making it heavy and harder to navigate.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main geometry and meshing workflows: creation, import/export, boolean operations, grouping, transformations, and mesh generation/computation. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no scaling, no mesh deletion explicitly but delete_object likely covers it), but core operations are well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources