Skip to main content
Glama
gmcfuerte

YOOtheme MCP Lite

by gmcfuerte
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to YOOtheme MCP Lite

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • WP-MCP

      LAPSrj
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with WordPress sites through the WordPress REST API, dynamically exposing all routes as MCP tools for content management and site configuration.
      -

    • mcp-tools

      stef7
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP servers to interact with WordPress sites via REST API, supporting multiple sites and aggregated tools.
      -

    • wpagent-mcp

      THE-KIPDEV
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible clients to securely operate a WordPress site through a signed REST API, managing plugins, content, themes, menus, media, users, WooCommerce, Elementor, audits, and allowlisted WP-CLI commands.
      58
      59 npm
      MIT

    • GMC Builder MCP Lite

      gmcfuerte
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables read-only inspection of configured WordPress and Joomla GMC Builder sites: listing site aliases and platforms, running an authenticated connectivity probe, retrieving up to ten builder element type names, and summarizing locally supplied layout JSON into node counts and types. It runs locally over stdio with credential environment variables, a fixed GET allowlist, and rate-limited requests.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action and resource: listing sites, pinging a site, listing pages, and summarizing layout JSON. No two tools overlap in purpose, and the descriptions clearly delineate their boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same yootheme_lite_ prefix and snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_sites, ping_site, list_pages, summarize_layout). This consistency makes them predictable and easy to select.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools are appropriate for a 'lite' server focused on safe, read-only introspection. Each tool earns its place without redundancy, and the count is well within the typical 3–15 range.

    Completeness3/5

    The surface covers listing and basic checks but lacks get operations for individual sites, pages, or layouts, and has no write or update capabilities. While intentional for a lite server, these gaps limit deeper inspection and may force agents to seek other tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources