Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Hive MCP Server

Hive MCP Server

by gluneau
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

send_token

Send HIVE or HBD tokens to any Hive account by specifying recipient, amount, currency, and optional memo.

Instructions

Send HIVE or HBD tokens to another Hive account using the configured account credentials.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "to": "<to>",
      "amount": "<amount>",
      "currency": "<currency>"
    },
    "name": "send_token"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
toYesRecipient Hive username
memoNoOptional memo to include with the transaction
amountYesAmount of tokens to send
currencyYesCurrency to send: HIVE or HBD

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions 'using the configured account credentials' but fails to detail destructive nature (sending is a write operation), potential errors (e.g., insufficient balance), or rate limits. The description is too brief for a financial transaction tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no extraneous words. While concise, it could include a brief front-loaded summary of the key action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has no output schema, and the description fails to explain what happens after sending (e.g., success confirmation, transaction ID). It neither describes return format nor side effects, leaving the agent uninformed about the outcome.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds no further semantic context beyond the schema, such as explanation of memo or amount constraints. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (send), the resource (HIVE or HBD tokens), and the context (to another Hive account). It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_comment or vote_on_post, and even from send_encrypted_message by specifying the currency types.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like send_encrypted_message or other transfer methods. No when-not-to-use or prerequisite information is included.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools